03-13-2018 09:19 AM - edited 03-05-2019 10:05 AM
Hi,
We have 2 x 10Gbps links configured on each of a pair of 4500-X switches configured for VSS - with the intention of creating a 20Gbps VSL port-channel.
I have noticed that that one of the port-channel links is in the waiting state:
10 Po10(SU) - Te1/1/1(P) Te1/2/8(w)
11 Po11(SU) - Te2/1/1(P) Te2/2/8(w)
Working interface configs:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/1
description VSS
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
no lldp transmit
no lldp receive
channel-group 10 mode on
service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
end
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/1/1
description VSS
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
no lldp transmit
no lldp receive
channel-group 11 mode on
service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
end
Not-working interface configs:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/2/8
description VSS
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
no lldp transmit
no lldp receive
channel-group 10 mode on
service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
end
interface TenGigabitEthernet2/2/8
description VSS
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
no lldp transmit
no lldp receive
channel-group 11 mode on
service-policy output VSL-Queuing-Policy
end
03-14-2018 05:27 AM
Hi,
Could you please show me the interface port-channel 10 & 11 configuration?
It should be:
[.......]
interface Port-channel10
description VSL 1
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switch virtual link 1
!
interface Port-channel11
description VSL 2
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switch virtual link 2
[.......]
Add no cdp enable on each VSL interfaces (Te1/1/1 - Te1/2/8 - Te2/1/1 - Te2/2/8)
Check also with these commands:
SW1#sh switch virtual link
SW1#sh switch virtual link port-channel
Best Regards,
If this helps, please rate.
Ben
03-14-2018 06:05 AM
Thanks for your reply Ben.
Config is exactly as you describe:
interface Port-channel10
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switch virtual link 1
interface Port-channel11
switchport
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switch virtual link 2
There is a difference between show etherchannel summary:
10 Po10(SU) - Te1/1/1(P) Te1/2/8(w)
11 Po11(SU) - Te2/1/1(P) Te2/2/8(w)
..and show switch virtual link port-channels
10 Po10(SU) - Te1/1/1(P) Te1/2/8(D)
11 Po11(SU) - Te2/1/1(P) Te2/2/8(D)
03-14-2018 12:01 PM
Ok,
Do the logs show anything other than the interface going down ?
If you swap the working interface cable to the non working is it still the same?
What is the image used on 4500? IOS version?
Do you try an update?
Check this: https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCut09985/?rfs=iqvred
Best Regards.
If this helps, please rate.
Ben
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide