cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
83019
Views
21
Helpful
73
Comments
xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Introduction

IOS devices have the concept of control plane policing. IOS-XR doesn't use that concept but instead uses a very comprehensive and powerful Local Packet Transport Services. In this document it is explained how LPTS works and how you can work with it, monitor and verify it.

Core Issue

LPTS is the concept of reflexive ACL's, punt policers and has an "internal" FIB or iFIB that directs certain packets to various nodes. IOS-XR can handle certain traffic on the linecard (such as BFD, Netflow and ARP) and these packets are instructed by LPTS to be handled by the local CPU rather then the RSP CPU.

At the same time, there are ACL's in place that allow for instance the punting of Telnet traffic and then per host if configured so, but another component of LPTS called MPP, the Management Plane Protection.

Generally, the default values for LPTS provide the level of protection you are after. However there are some rare circumstances whereby you want to tune the values of LPTS in order to get the service levels you need. LPTS is very dynamic in nature and pierces holes into the protection system as particular items are configured.

The LPTS policers work on a per NP basis. So if the LPTS police value is set to 1000pps that means that every NP on the LC can punt with 1000pps to the RSP CPU or LC CPU. This is something to take into consideration when evaluating the A9K-8T-x cards who have 8 NPU's per LC.

Take extreme care when changing the LPTS policer values.

High level overview

From a birds eye view, LPTS looks like this:

overview.jpg

The NPU has a table that tells it where to send packet to (LC or RSP) as part of the "internal FIB" or iFIB. These packets are punted at a pre-defined rate, they can be tuned in XR release 4.x and later. Also in the TCAM which is used in the ASR9K for ACLs (amongst others), are lists that define which packets we want to allow and not. This will be discussed in the MPP section of this document.

LPTS is composed of a (set of) dynamic ACL's (which are created as part of user configuration dynamically, or automitcally inserted as peerings establish), an internal "routing table" (iFIB) and a set of policers for different punt reasons.

LPTS Characteristics

0) LPTS has Hardware policers on line cards to limit traffic sent to local or remote nodes
0) LPTS entries in TCAM classifies packets to select a policer to apply
0) The policer value can be tuned to 0 (to drop all packet matching classification criteria)
0) Polices on protocol (BGP, OSPF, SSH) and flow state (BGP established, BGP configured, and BGP listen)
0) Policing done on the LC Hardware ASIC before packets hit RP/LC CPU
0) Filters are automatically and dynamically installed by the IOS XR infrastructure

So for-me packets are undergoing the Pre iFIB classification and policing upon which they are directed by the iFIB, which is the second level of filtering to the destination node.

LPTS Firewalling

One of the great strenghts with LPTS is the dynamic ACL creation. This is configuration driven and no user intervention is required.

In addition to that, LPTS has different flow categories based on the state of the protocol. For instance, BGP has 3 different states:

  1. Unknown
  2. Configured
  3. Established

Unknown is the flow whereby we have TCP port 179 traffic, but we have no neighbor configured from that source. Policed very heavily.

Configured is the entry whereby we know the source address of the peer, but the session is not yet established (no known source port from the peer), Policed moderately.

Established is where we have all the L3 and L4 data from the session. Lightly policed.

The entries for configured is driven by the configuration of the neighbor statement under the router BGP section.

Established is dynamically inserted when the peer establishes.

You could theoretically police the unknown to a rate of zero.

Example:

Router bgp

   neighbor 192.168.1.1

   …

!

The following table can be seen with the output of the command:

show lpts pifib hardware entry brief loc 0/3/cpu0 | i 179

LocalPortRemotePortRateState
any179ANYANY100unknown
any179192.168.1.1ANY1,000configured
192.168.1.2179192.168.1.1222310,000established

If you use the command

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-TOP#show lpts pifib hardware entry location 0/3/CPU0 | be 33.33.1  

You can check the detailed entry of the PiFIB (policer)

Source IP         : 33.33.1.1                        the remote address

Is Fragment       : 0                                fragments allowed

Interface         : any                              expected source interface

M/L/T/F           : 0/IPv4_STACK/0/BGP-known

DestNode          : 48                               where the packets are sent to

DestAddr          : 48

L4 Protocol       : TCP

TCP flag byte     : any                              additional security checks at TCP level

Source port       : Port:179

Destination Port  : 11293

Accepted/Dropped  : 117866/0                         packets accepted and denied

# of TCAM entries : 1                                number of tcam entries burnt for this PiFIB entry

HPo/HAr/HBu/Cir   : 1924676/2500pps/2500ms/2500pps

State             : Entry in TCAM                    status of the entry


Configuring LPTS police rates

You can configure the LPTS Policers on a PiFIB bases and also the punt policers can be adjusted.

The following commands apply. Note that this is on a per linecard basis. All NPU's on that linecard will get reconfigured.

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#lpts punt police location 0/0/CPU0 protocol ?

  arp              ARP packets

  bfd              Bidirectional Forwarding Detection packets

  cdp              Cisco Discovery Protocol packets

  cfm              Connectivity Fault Management Protocol packets

  cgmp             Cisco Group Management Protocol packets

  dhcp             Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol packets

  efm              Ethernet in the First Mile Protocol packets

  igmp-snoop       Internet Group Management Protocol Snoop packets

  ipiw-arp         L2VPN IPIW ARP packets

  ipv4             IPv4 packets

  ipv6             IPv6 packets

  lacp             Bundle Protocol packets

  mofrr            Multicast-only FRR packets

  mpls             MPLS punt packets

  mstp             Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol packets

  mvrp             Multiple VLAN Registration Protocol packets

  ppp              Point-to-Point Protocol packets

  pppoe            Point-to-Point Protocol over Ethernet packets

  rarp             Reverse ARP packets

  vccv             Virtual Circuit Connection Verification packets

  vidmon           Video Monitoring packets

  vidmon-flow-add  Video Monitoring flow add packets

Exception packets can be reconfigured by the following command: lpts punt police location 0/0/CPU0 exception

Glean adjacency or ACL-deny packets can be tuned for instance via that command.

The PIFIB can be reconfigured via the following commands:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG(config)#lpts pifib hardware ...

  • In there you can enter the linecard you wish to specifically reconfigure
  • The policer flow values
  • And the TCAM entries (this is new in XR420)   
    • As you've seen LPTS can dynamically create "ACL" entries for dynamic firewalling and for MPP. This command limits the number of TCAM entries that LPTS can use so that space is available for other purposes such as regular ACL's, QOS matching, EFP matching etc.

LPTS static-police and police differences

The command “police” is used to check policer values, accept/drop counts for packets matching LPTS TCAM(mostly L3 packets) entries whereas “static-police” is used to check policer values.

Accept/drop counts for packets matching static punt reasons programmed in search structures (Mostly L2 and exception packets).

policer” is for dynamic flows (like BGP, OSPF, etc protocols directed  by RSP)

static-policer” is for pseudo Static flows (like BFD, CFM directed by the LC) These are hard-coded and include Exception processing packets.

There is a CLI to change few of the exception processing as well (for e.g. ICMP unreachable)

Monitoring LPTS

LPTS is not SNMP enabled (request has been filed and is in the works, no target release defined at time of writing). Though there are very inventive ways to monitor LPTS and generate alerts. There is a TCL script that you can use with EEM in order to get some level of alerting.

Attached to this article is the script package and here is how you set it up:

event manager environment EEM_LPTS_CHECK_INTERVAL 300

event manager environment EEM_LPTS_CHECK_FLOWTYPES BGP-known *

event manager environment EEM_LPTS_CHECK_LOCATIONS 0/0/CPU0 0/4/CPU0

event manager environment EEM_LPTS_CHECK_THRESHOLD 1 50%

event manager directory user policy disk0:/scripts/

event manager policy lpts-threshold-alerting.tcl username scripts

How to clear LPTS statistics

LPTS stats cannot be cleared by LPTS commands or qos counter clearing.

You can clear LPTS stats by clearing hte np controller stats:

"clear controllers np counters all location <>”

MPP: Managed Plane Protection

In the standard configuration all interfaces have access to the Telnet, SSH and SNMP daemons.

Inband vs Out of band

All linecard interfaces are designated to be inband, meaning they can transport user traffic as well as management traffic.

The mgmt interfaces on the RSP are designated out of band. This means that they can't transport user traffic but only management traffic.

Out-of-band interfaces can't "speak" to other interfaces as they are desginated for managment traffic. So eventhough there is a route in the system that would send traffic out of the mgmt interface, Fabric enabled interfaces on the LC can't

Here an example of out of band and the restrictions that it imposes on the forwarding

oob.jpg

Configuring MPP

By default when the service is configured, there are no mpp restrictions. All interfaces are able to accept the mgmt traffic for the service you defined. For example, when the telnet server is configured, LPTS reports the following binding:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#show lpts bindings brief | i (any.23 )

Tue Feb 28 12:00:55.195 EDT

0/RSP0/CPU0 TCP  LR IPV4 TCP    default   any          any,23 any

This means that every for me packet with port 23 as the dest port will get serviced.

Now when configuring MPP the bindings output changes:

control-plane

management-plane

  inband

   interface TenGigE0/1/0/0

    allow Telnet peer

     address ipv4 3.3.3.3

     address ipv4 5.5.5.0/28

    !

   !

   interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/10

    allow Telnet

   !

  !

!

In this configuration example I am designating two interfaces as inband, so they will still be able to forward transient traffic and allow inbound telnet traffic. At the same time I allow telnet from any host on Gig0/0/0/10 and only telnet from a few peers on Te0/1/0/0.

The LPTS bindings are dynamically changed as per following output:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#show lpts bindings brief | i (any.23 )

Tue Feb 28 12:06:48.339 EDT

0/RSP0/CPU0 TCP  LR IPV4 TCP    default   Gi0/0/0/10   any,23 any                 << Any source can access my telnet on this intf

0/RSP0/CPU0 TCP  LR IPV4 TCP    default   Mg0/RSP0/CPU0/0 any,23 any            << Dedicated inband

0/RSP0/CPU0 TCP  LR IPV4 TCP    default   Te0/1/0/0    any,23 3.3.3.3          << /32 host access for telnet on dedicated intf

0/RSP0/CPU0 TCP  LR IPV4 TCP    default   Te0/1/0/0    any,23 5.5.5.0/28    << Hosts from this subnet on this intf

Powerful eh!?!

We can also look at the pre internal fib (piFIB) and check the entries there:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:A9K-BNG#show lpts pifib hardware entry bri location 0/1/cpu0 | i (.23 )

Tue Feb 28 12:27:46.389 EDT

7      IPV4 default      TCP    Te0/1/0/0       LU(48) any,23 3.3.3.3,any

10     IPV4 default      TCP    Te0/1/0/0       LU(48) any,23 5.5.5.0/28,any


Decoding the Destnode in LPTS entries

In the example above you see the following detail: LU(48). This section explains that number and detail.

The LU means local unicast fabric. The 48 is a very interesting number.

The device that this output is taken from is an ASR9010. Which has 8 LC slots and 2 RSP slots. On both sides of the RSP's in the middle

are the 4 LC's

If I were to decode the 30 into binary it looks like this:

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |     Position

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |     Bit value for Decimal 48

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

|LC |LC |RSP|RSP|LC |LC |LC |LC |     Slot position filling (note 2 left most LC's not drawn)

+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+

Now you can see that the 1's are in position 5 and 4, and if you look at the slot numbering of the ASR9006, you can see that these are

the RSP's!! So telnet is delivered to the RSP.

Restrictions for MPP

1) Currently MPP doesn’t keep track of the denied or dropped protocol requests
2) The management protocols need to be enabled explicitly
–MPP configuration doesn’t enable the protocol services.
–MPP is only responsible for making the services available on different interfaces
3) Management requests received on in-band interfaces may not be acknowledged on in-band interfaces
4) RSP Management Ethernet interfaces are by default out-of-band interfaces
5) MPP configuration changes doesn’t affect active sessions established before the changes

6) No MIB Support

Related Information

Cisco Guide to Harden Cisco IOS XR Devices

LPTS Considerations

If you can use only p2p OSPF network type

flow ospf-uc-known rate 0

flow ospf-uc-default rate 0

Note that OSPF p2p network type is the recommended setting even on Ethernet interfaces unless you have multiple routers on the same segment.
Do we really need BGP, LDP-TCP, MSDP, default – for unconfigured sessions

flow bgp-default rate 0

flow ldp-tcp-default rate 0

flow msdp-default rate 0

Xander Thuijs, CCIE #6775

Sr. Tech Lead ASR9000


Comments

I filter only drop as below:

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:r1#sho lpts pifib hardware static-police location 0/0/CPU0

Punt Reason             SID                     Flow Rate  Burst Rate Accepted             Dropped              Destination
----------------------- ----------------------- ---------  ---------  -------------------- -------------------- -----------

IPV4MC_DO_ALL_BUT_FWD   NETIO_LOW               1000       1000       2318                 2147                 Local               
PUNT_NO_MATCH           NETIO_LOW               200        200        146026275            51                   Local               
IPV4_TTL_ERROR          NETIO_LOW               500        400        8610447              2875307              Local               

PUNT_ADJ                NETIO_LOW               300        200        91489353             238319               Local              

MPLS_TTL_ONE_PUNT       NETIO_LOW               500        400        23482                80884                Local              

In my opinion, depend on the customer isn’t make sense because each customer have behavior differently. For example customer A may ping repeat 1000 size 100, customer B ping repeat 2000 size 1500. Does Cisco have any recommend? I ping from PE to CE, the result is normally. This is result from my customer:

KR#ping x.x.128.157 re 1000 size 100 data 0000

Success rate is 100 percent (1000/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms

KR#ping x.x.128.157 re 1000 size 1500 data 0000

Success rate is 95 percent (953/1000), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/4 ms

Thank you very much.

smailmilak
Level 4
Level 4

Hi Xander,

I was going trough the LPTS config guide in hope to find out if it's possible to get a log message if LPTS has dropped one or more packets.

Under "show lpts pifib hardware police location 0/0/0" we have the column "dropped". It would be cool if we could be alarmed that a drop has occurred.

Hmm, maybe it's possible to use SNMP for that?

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

hi smail, yeah the attached alerting script helps with generating some alerts on defined variables/policers from lpts. natively in xr that doesnt exist.

recently there was an snmp mib added for lpts, so yeah you can do it off box.

xander

vividhat
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Xander,

The information provided in article is very much useful.

As per below logs, every time only below 2 interfaces got affected due to penalty and other 2 were not affected.

So wanted to check if there is any algorithm/rule to select the interfaces to be penalized or interfaces gets affected randomly.

It appears that you do not have JavaScript enabled, please contact your administrator.
LC/0/2/CPU0:Jul  5 15:24:15.928 IST: flowtrap[199]: %OS-FLOWTRAP-4-BAD_ACTOR_MAC_DETECTED : Excessive Bundle protocol flow detected from source MAC address bcf1.f2cb.9cc1 on interface Bundle-Ether21. Traffic from this MAC address will be dropped for 15 minutes.

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul  5 15:24:18.306 IST: BM-DISTRIB[1191]: %L2-BM-6-ACTIVE : GigabitEthernet0/2/0/4 is no longer Active as part of Bundle-Ether21 (Link is Expired; LACPDUs are not being received from the partner)
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul  5 15:24:19.012 IST: BM-DISTRIB[1191]: %L2-BM-6-ACTIVE : GigabitEthernet0/2/0/5 is no longer Active as part of Bundle-Ether21 (Link is Expired; LACPDUs are not being received from the partner)
LC/0/2/CPU0:Jul  5 15:39:15.935 IST: flowtrap[199]: %OS-FLOWTRAP-4-BAD_ACTOR_MAC_CLEARED : Source MAC bcf1.f2cb.9cc1 on interface Bundle-Ether21 cleared from penalty-policing by timeout.
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul  5 15:39:18.652 IST: BM-DISTRIB[1191]: %L2-BM-6-ACTIVE : GigabitEthernet0/2/0/4 is Active as part of Bundle-Ether21
RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul  5 15:39:18.655 IST: BM-DISTRIB[1191]: %L2-BM-6-ACTIVE : GigabitEthernet0/2/0/5 is Active as part of Bundle-Ether21
xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

yeah it looks like the LACP messages are tripping the flow trap here causing your bundle members to flap. you cannot selectively enable interfaces unfortunately. one thing to do is to use lacp period long to reduce the messages.

here is some reference on that flow trap:

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r5-3/bng/configuration/guide/b-bng-cg53xasr9k/b-bng-cg53xasr9k_chapter_0111.html

may want to do a tac case to file for an enhancement possibly to allowexclusion of LACP.

or also increase the flow rate allowed, this could alleviate the problem too.

xander

vividhat
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Thanks for the revert.

I am not willing to enable selection of interfaces to get penalized. I want to know that is there any mechanism or algorithm which selects the interfaces or can we conclude that although there are 4 interfaces in bundle, any randomly selected interfaces will get penalized.

Is there any documentation available on LPTS treatment for Excessive Bundle Protocol Flow?

xthuijs
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

LPTS resides in the npu, when the packet is punted to the RP the flow trap is evaluated.

so EPFT looks at the aggregate of all punted packets by source.

LPTS doesnt have that granularity:

if LPTS can punt 100pps say, a single source can punt at 100 and anything in excess gets dropped by lpts. but if there is a single source that uses the 100pps, EPFT is the intelligence that identifies that there is a source that consumes more then its fair share.

this resides on the centralized point of teh RP, which is where we identify if there is a bad actor or not.

since a bundle shares the mac over the members, some protos that use all members, like lacp, could see an amplified number of packets from the same mac.

I personally feel that LACP should not be included in this evaluation but at the same time if we don't having a subscriber facing port could exploit this by sending excessive lacp to the peer.

so the best recommendation is to tune the flow trap policer to accommodate the lacp messages that are realistically needed for this bundle. (that is not setting it too strict, which I think happened here: lacp period short, >> # of members, low pps threshold).

xander

vividhat
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Xander,

Thanks for valuable feedback. I have got my query solved with the help of information provided by you and some research.

Once again thanks for replying (as always).

Yang
Level 1
Level 1

Can you post a list of annotations for punt reason/flowtypes just like the NP counter document? In particular I would like to know where IPv6 fits in on flowtypes. Only 2 flowtypes with v6 (MIPv6, DHCPv6). For example, differnt types of ICMPv6 packets.

pganesha
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

thanks for this article. I have a few questions:

 

1// What do you mean by 'pseudo-static' flows in relation to bfd?

 

2// Why is BFD displayed under the command 'show lpts pifib hardware police location' if it does not go through the LPTS infrastructure?

 

3// Is it possible to alter the pps rate of bfd flows?

 

thank you,

Prakash

 

 

 

 

fansari1984
Level 1
Level 1

Xander

 

In the very beginning of this post sagou.brahim posted a question mentioned below.

 

Hi Xander,

thank you for this useful information (and for all your other contributions ).

I'd have a question about this LPTS point :

I have a network with a configured L3VPN configured the usual way.

A VRF instance is configured in the different routers, and in each router a loopback interface is assigned to that VRF instance.The IP address of the loopback interfaces  is announced by MP-BGP in the MPLS core.

So these IP adresses are reachable (we can ping them from the routers or some workstations). But we can not establish a telnet or ssh session to them. I made some research and found that it is certainly related to the LPTS feature (the command "show lpts ifib statistics" show that everytime I try a telnet/ssh connection, the counter "reject" increments by 1).

I also found that one of MPP requirements is that in case we try to manage a VRF interface, the inband interface we use to join the router must belong to that same VRF, but in the case of L3VPN, inband interfaces are MPLS interfaces, not configured to belong to any VRF instance.

So I believe with MPP configured, there is no way to manage a router through a MPLS interface?

Best regards,

Brahim

 

You provided various things to check and I read the entire post and wondering if sagou.brahim configuration ever worked ? I had a similar situation where my ASR9K rejecting telnet if I use below configuration:

 

control-plane
 management-plane
  inband

interface X (IGP Interface)

allow all

interface Y (IGP Interface)

allow all

interface Loopback1

allow all

 

Telnet connections to IGP interfaces worked just fine.

 

If i change above configuration and use "interface-all" then telnet to Lo1 stared working.

 

control-plane
 management-plane
  inband
   interface all

allow all

 
davhume
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Xander,

 

Excellent article!!

 

Our customer running a national MPLS network with ASR9001 PE devices (XR 6.1.4) has experienced sustain outages due to broadcast ARP storms generated accidently by their downstream access networks, causing ARP to be completely exhausted, and then LPTS indiscriminately drops legitimate ARP requests, and thus, connectivity issues arise (SR 687256096)

 

We understand that Excessive Punt Flow will help us here, however from my testing in our lab it would seem that we 'may' be hitting a bug where EPFT causes instability to VRRP instances running hello timers of 100ms (Techzone Reference / SR 687365675 )

 

In the meantime, we would like to use an EEM script such as the one you have provided to monitor LPTS ARP drop-rate during a storm and generate a syslog, however the command executed 'show lpts pifib hardware police location <loc>' is only for Dynamic Flows, and not for flows handled by the LC, so ARP is not available.

 

Do you have any suggestions on how to go about running such an EEM script to achieve this, as im sure this question has been asked in the past, though i have not been able to find any documentation/cases around it.

 

[Command Ref 1]

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:RTCSR2032004TS#show lpts pifib hardware police location 0/0/CPU0 | i "ARP|VRRP|Dropped"

Mon Aug 26 22:33:05.137 UTC

FlowType               Policer Type    Cur. Rate  Def. Rate  Accepted             Dropped              TOS Value

VRRP                   48      Static  1000       1000       497073587            972159               01234567

 

 

[Command Ref 2]

 

RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:RTCSR2032004TS#show lpts pifib hardware static-police location 0/0/cpu0 | in "ARP|Dropped"

Mon Aug 26 22:33:22.755 UTC

Punt Reason             SID                     Flow Rate  Burst Rate Accepted             Dropped             Destination

PUNT_PBR_DIVERT         ARP                     1000       200        0                    0                    Local

ARP                     ARP                     1000       200        13040542             590038               Local

RARP                    NETIO_CRUCIAL           1000       200        2562                 0                    Local

 

 

Many thanks,

Dave Hume - HTE

junnyang
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Xander,

 

Thank you for sharing.

 

I tested it and it works well, but it doesn't seem to work in eXR. Is there anything that needs to be modified?

 

Best Regards,

Johnny

 

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Quick Links