cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
787
Views
15
Helpful
2
Replies

Bundle-Ether between A9K and N3K

razorlzr667
Level 1
Level 1

Hello !

 

I'm having a problem with the configuration of a bundle-ether between an A9K and an N3K, the configuration is below.

The bundle doesn't work when I want to use a sub-interface with vlan, but it works without. Do you have an idea?

 

On A9K :

 

interface Bundle-Ether1
bundle minimum-active links 1
!
interface Bundle-Ether1.55
ipv4 address xxx xxx xxx
encapsulation dot1q 55
!
interface TenGigE0/1/0/7
bundle id 1 mode active
bundle port-priority 1
!
interface TenGigE0/2/0/7
bundle id 1 mode active
bundle port-priority 1
!
!

 

On N3K :

 

interface port-channel3
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 55
switchport trunk allowed vlan 55
speed 10000
duplex full
vpc 3

 

interface Ethernet1/1 & 1/2
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk native vlan 55
switchport trunk allowed vlan 55
speed 10000
duplex full
channel-group 3 mode active

 

Thanks

2 Replies 2

Mark Elsen
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

 

                 - Check the logs on both platforms, when the bundle is intended to get formed or 'started'

 M.



-- Let everything happen to you  
       Beauty and terror
      Just keep going    
       No feeling is final
Reiner Maria Rilke (1899)

Hello,

 

the problem might be the native vlan. The ASR does not have a 'native' option, but you can add the 'untagged'keyword:

 

interface Bundle-Ether1.55
ipv4 address xxx xxx xxx
--> encapsulation dot1q 55, untagged