09-22-2016 11:49 PM - edited 03-08-2019 07:33 AM
Hello, please help me.
I cant enable routing on Cisco 4500x. I add static route of last resort and other static route and type ip routing in configuration mode.
But I cant see string ip routing in running config.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.XX.YY.ZZ
ip route 7.7.7.0 255.255.255.0 10.XX.YYY.Z
Core4500_1#sh ip route static
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, H - NHRP, l - LISP
a - application route
+ - replicated route, % - next hop override
Gateway of last resort is not set
sh ver
License Information for 'WS-C4500X-16'
License Level: ipbase Type: Permanent
Next reboot license Level: ipbase
cisco WS-C4500X-16 (MPC8572) processor (revision 9) with 4194304K bytes of physical memory.
Processor board ID JAE191508VD
MPC8572 CPU at 1.5GHz, Cisco Catalyst 4500X
Last reset from Reload
50 Virtual Ethernet interfaces
16 Ten Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
511K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
Configuration register is 0x2101
09-23-2016 06:29 AM
The output of show ip protocol might be helpful. Also the output of show ip route would be helpful. Are you sure that 10.xx.yy.z is a valid reachable address? Can you post the output of the attempt to ping this address?
HTH
Rick
12-12-2016 03:58 AM
Hello Richard, I figured out what the problem was, or rather it was not even. Cisco 4500x tuned dugim without connecting to networks, and therefore not visible in the configuration of static routes. Connecting Cisco 4500x network, everything was ok, routes become visible.
12-12-2016 05:26 AM
Hello
That is correct, the static WONT be added unless you have an active connected interface or the non direct nexthop is reachable by other nexthops in the route table that state have readability towards it.
res
Paul
12-12-2016 07:49 AM
Thanks for posting back to the forum to let us know that you have resolved your issue. Paul is quite right that with no interfaces connected there would not have been any entries in the route table (except for loopback interfaces) and if the next hop in the static route is not reachable then the route is not placed in the routing table.
HTH
Rick
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide