02-19-2013 09:36 AM - edited 03-07-2019 11:48 AM
I have two stacks 3750X on two different sites with two links L_2_L, and I want to configure the port channel to aggregate the two links.
Site A Site B
3750X -A1 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B1
( L-2-L )
3750X -A2 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B2
below the configuration that I have put the two stacks.
site A
interface Port-channel5
description Etherchannel group entre le stack 3750X-A et Switch Lan_2_Lan
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15
description la liaison LAN_2_LAN
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
duplex full
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/15
description la liaison LAN_2_LAN
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
duplex full
channel-group 5 mode passive
Site B
interface Port-channel5
description Etherchannel group entre le stack 3750X-A et Switch Lan_2_Lan
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/15
description la liaison LAN_2_LAN
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
duplex full
channel-group 5 mode active
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/15
description la liaison LAN_2_LAN
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,12,999
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
speed 100
duplex full
channel-group 5 mode active
but the problem is only one link is Bundeled in channel group, see below
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Gi1/0/15(I) Gi2/0/15(P)
how can i resolv this problem?
Best regards
02-19-2013 10:19 AM
On site A you have:
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/15
switchport nonegotiate
channel-group 5 mode passive
change the channel-group 5 mode active or remove the switchport nonegotiate
02-20-2013 02:03 AM
Hi,
I changed the config, but the problem persist.
Best regards
02-20-2013 03:39 AM
Hi ,
I just tested the similar configuration on my devices and it worked fine.
Please find below my configuration:
Sw1---F0/1 & f0/2---connected to Sw F0/1& f0/2
SW1
interface FastEthernet0/1
channel-group 5 mode active
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
channel-group 5 mode active
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
interface Port-channel 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
SW2:
======
interface FastEthernet0/1
channel-group 5 mode active
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
!
interface FastEthernet0/2
channel-group 5 mode active
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
!
interface Port-channel 5
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
Outputs of show etherchannel summary:
==============================
Switch1 #show etherchannel summary
Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
I - stand-alone s - suspended
H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
R - Layer3 S - Layer2
U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator
u - unsuitable for bundling
w - waiting to be aggregated
d - default port
Number of channel-groups in use: 1
Number of aggregators: 1
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)
2)
Switch2#show etherchannel summary
Flags: D - down P - in port-channel
I - stand-alone s - suspended
H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
R - Layer3 S - Layer2
U - in use f - failed to allocate aggregator
u - unsuitable for bundling
w - waiting to be aggregated
d - default port
Number of channel-groups in use: 1
Number of aggregators: 1
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Fa0/1(P) Fa0/2(P)
HTH
Regards
Inayath
*Plz rate if this is helpfull.
02-20-2013 03:45 AM
Hi,
If still not working then do the following on both the devices:
1- Default the interfaces. ([config]# default int GigabitEthernet1/0/15 & 2/0/15)
2- shut the interface
3- configure the ports with your port configuration ( Make sure you have Channel-group Active -Active at both the side).
4-configure the port-channel on both the devices.
5- Re-enable the port @ both the ends.
This should work.
HTH
REgards
Inayath
02-20-2013 05:32 AM
Actually it is not a good practice to use nonegotiate with LACP, (active active on both side) I would remove all the nonegotiate from all the interfaces including portchannel.
Thanks,
Fraydoon
02-20-2013 11:59 AM
Have u check Cisco Recomended Setting. Please see this
** Rate all Helpful Posts **
02-20-2013 03:42 PM
Hi All,
thank you for your answers.
I already applied the same comments that you have communicated to me and I followed the same documents that you mentioned.
and the problem persist.
to remind you, I used active mode for all interface on both sites. and I have two links L_2_L with optical fbre
I noticed that with the current setup I have the following result:
Site A Site B
3750X -A1 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B1
( L-2-L )
3750X -A2 --------------------------------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B2
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Gi1/0/15(I) Gi2/0/15(P)
but when I permute the two fiber links I get the following result:
Site A Site B
3750X -A1 --------\ /------------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B1
\-------- / ------\ ( L-2-L )
3750X -A2 -----------------/ \------( )--------------------------------------- 3750X -B2
Group Port-channel Protocol Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
5 Po5(SU) LACP Gi1/0/15(P) Gi2/0/15(I)
as you see the status of interface changes when I change the location of links, it is possible that the problem was related a links L_2_L?
Best regards
02-20-2013 05:17 PM
Hi,
Yes there could be possiblity.
Kindly try changing the cable and sfp ports and test the same.
Regards
Inayath
10-04-2013 12:25 AM
Hi,
I notice you have the Port channel on both site as active, is there a reason why you do this? Reason why i ask is because usually port channel mode should be either
1. On - On
2. Active-Passive
3. Passive-Active
I would suggest you recreating the port channel and hard code both end as ON instead of using negotiation. I have a very similar setup and it works for me.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: