About SandevChopra07800

SandevChopra07800 · 03-08-2025

Hi Board, I am in the middle of migrating from Legacy NXOS to ACI. There is a vlan on the legacy side that is used for both servers and transit to firewall having static routes configured towards the FW. So basically, there is a /24 SVI that has both...

SandevChopra07800 · 01-17-2025

Hi Folks, we are moving a UCS FI-6332 system from old Network switches to new ACI Leaf switches. As part of the physical move, we are also changing the uplink ports on the FIs: Previous ports being 10G/SFP port and new ones are 40G/QSFP. Now I know t...

SandevChopra07800 · 11-12-2024

Hi Fellow members, I am doing an ACI deployment and have a use case to use the same PO to the Firewall for both L2-EPG extensions and L3Out. So there will be some sub-interfaces on the FW, one of them will be an inside transit-interface used as an L3...

SandevChopra07800 · 10-03-2024

Hi, We have a couple of c240-M6 rackmount servers that are FI-attached and managed via Intersight. I have the oob CIMC port of the servers connected to some Mgmt-switch (Not FIs). There is a IMC policy > Ip-pool assigned to the Service profile templa...

SandevChopra07800 · 07-08-2024

Hi Folks, we are migrating UCS B-series servers from old Fabric Interconnects to new ones. Both the environments are managed by UCSM and use native fibre Channel. As part of the migration, we want to maintain the same WWPN on the vHBAs as the previou...

SandevChopra07800 · 03-10-2025

Please re-read my original Question.

SandevChopra07800 · 03-10-2025

Layer2 migrations have been completed. All servers are physically connected to the ACI fabric. We are now planning for Layer3 moves (Getting the SVIs migrated over). Hope this clarifies.

SandevChopra07800 · 11-14-2024

Thanks to Gemini. Chris Welsh, I came across this similar post from you: https://community.cisco.com/t5/application-centric-infrastructure/aci-l3out-svi-and-l2-epg-extension-same-port-channel/td-p/4602228 So can I get this done by two non-overlapping...

SandevChopra07800 · 11-13-2024

Yes.. PO is port-channel.:) Physical diagram attached. Logically you have the FW having one sub-interface on the PO (po.10) which is a transit vlan b/w the Leafs and FW. It also have few other sub-interfaces (po.11-.20) as the server gateways. Simila...

SandevChopra07800 · 10-03-2024

I see CIMC still as a backdoor to the server, so its always good to have regardless. Without the Intersight mode, in the previous years where all was managed by UCSM, there was a FEX which got connected to the FIs and then all the C-servers connected...

Member Since	‎08-04-2020 12:41 PM
Date Last Visited	‎03-18-2025 02:34 AM
Posts	58
Total Helpful Votes Received	2

User Statistics

User Activity

L3Out on an existing BD subnet

Changing NW Uplinks in UCS, server reboot required?

L3Out and L2-EPG extensions using same PO

CIMC ip for a FI-attached C240-M6 server in IMM

Changing WWPN of a vHBA once derived from a Pool

Re: L3Out on an existing BD subnet

Re: L3Out on an existing BD subnet

Re: L3Out and L2-EPG extensions using same PO

Re: L3Out and L2-EPG extensions using same PO

Re: CIMC ip for a FI-attached C240-M6 server in IMM