Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi AllI have the scenario below:PC1----eth---Cisco ASR1004(1)---stmx link------CiscoASR1004(2)----eth---PC2I would like to use eompls so that pc1 and pc2 are in the same subnet.I have configured the xconnect on a vlan subinterfaces enabled mpls with ...
I'm moving this https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/2016937#2016937 discussion here because I feel I will get a quicker response.In a nutshell the setup is as below:ASR1004=={ GRE }==C7206I need to run layer 2 services between the 2 without mpls ...
Hi All.Consider the following scenario.Node A. --->Switch---->C7609--{...Internet..}--C7200--NodeBNode A has IP 192.168.1.1Node B has IP 192.168.1.2So far I have a working gre tunnel between the routers.How do I get Node A to talk to Node B ?Any help...
Hello Laurent,We have extreme networks switches connected on both sides. This are basically configured with vlan tagged on asr side and untagged on P.C side.Regards
I have decided to go with an EoMPLSoGRE setup.So far I have:the gre tunnel upthe mpls l2transport vc upthe setup is:asr1004====GRE====c7206the xconnect is on ge interfaces in the 2 boxes and the ce is a pc on one end and a switch on the other.My chal...
I have the basic tunnel between the cisco routers up but i suspect my whole approach seems wrong.Node A. --->Switch---->C7609--{...Internet..}--C7200--NodeBNode A has IP 192.168.1.1Node B has IP 192.168.1.2Unfortunatelly the iterfaces are all etherne...
