Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,
I am designing a network for low-bandwidth communication - resilience is in favor over performance.
Customer has their own fibres between sites.
Redundancy based on Layer 3 routing. this is a quite small network, with around 2 core switches, 2...
Hello,We are looking to deploy a vMX on Azure, for connectivity to our branch offices.According to Meraki setup guide (vMX Setup Guide for Microsoft Azure - Cisco Meraki) vMX Large is currently not supported for Azure - Only Small and Medium.Anyne kn...
Hello,If you deploy a vMX in Azure, and start with the small license, can you then later upgrade to fx. medium license on-the-fly? Or what is needed?And do you have to change the Azure VM type, if you upgrade from small to medium?Thanks for any help ...
Hello I am looking into extending 2 VLAN separated in 2 VRF's on premise, to Azure using VTI based IKEv2 VPN with 2 routers (Cisco ISR), each connected to different ISP. please refer to attached drawing... I am unsure if this is possible - could some...
Hello
I have an issue with MLS QoS on catalyst 3560cx platform... not sure why behaviour is like this.
I have done mapping of DSCP values to required queues, however on the interfaces where I am doing priority queueing (gig0/1 and gig0/2), no p...
That is good to hear, as this was also what I thought
And I should not get an issue with routing loops from the L3 Access connecting to the 2 distribution switches - correct? And you thin my the outlined links in topology looks correct?
yes core is on single site - distribution actually is different sites.... not sure how this matters - if you look at my topology, that show how the cabling is to be done.
Only thing that could be different, is link from dist to core, could be MC-LAG ...
sure that would be best scenario - however there is a quite significant cost difference between IE3100 and IE3300, so thats the reason customer would only buy L3/OSPF capable switches where link resiliency is required... make sense?
But do you otherw...
thank you for you reply - I am aware of HSRP, but for various reasons, customer would like to use OSPF/L3 for the redundant uplinks from Access2 (and a couple of other access switches not shown in topology) - would that be an issue in regards to rou...
