Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have a number of SDSL users (BT IP Stream)working from home.They connect from home to our network via a Draytek router.After power up of the router which has a user name and password it is given from our radius server an internal address of 10.180...
Hi Hope you can help me out here.We have home workers that connect via BT IP Stream (adsl) to our IT Department. On power up of the Draytek router(at the house) they are authenticated by our radius server and are given a 10.180.*.* address, this work...
I have two core switches one is a Enterasys 8600 and this is connected by gigabit connection to our Cisco 6500.We have a Vlan 20 with an ip range created on the 8600. I have passed this vlan (layer2) over the link to the 6500 and have a laptop on an ...
Hi ALL,Hope you may be able to help me out here.We have a number of Allied 8350GB 48 PORT layer 2 switches connected via LES Circuits to our 6500.We seem to have to reset these swithes quite often 3 today! for no apparent reason.The software on the A...
HiWe have an unlimited license. Sometimes we have had two users on and the pix has thrown us off and on other occasions we have had as many as eight users on before we have lost connectivity.Cheers Jim
Just a quick follow up question please. When one of the above people connect via the VPN Client we have no problem. When the second person connects also we have no problem with either connection. But when the first person disconnects and tries to re...
Hi FredYouve been spot on all the way our pix is software 6.3 so I put in the command isakmp-net-traversalAll works great now with no change to the client at all.Is there any problems doing this rather than the IPSEC over tcp.Cheers Jim
Hi FredYouve been spot on all the way our pix is software 6.3 so I put in the command isakmp-net-traversalAll works great now with no change to the client at all.Is there any problems doing this rather than the IPSEC over tcp.Cheers Jim