Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi everyone,I experienced an issue yesterday with a Cisco C9350-48T stack running IOS XE version 17.18.03a.The stack consists of 7 members. During the initial installation, I was unable to fully close the stack ring because the available stacking cab...
Hi everybody,I’m planning to implement a guest portal with self-registration in my company. Currently, we use a very outdated method where the guest Wi-Fi password is changed every day, which I don’t think is a good solution.I have proposed creating ...
Hi everyone,I want to do a project to set up employee Wi-Fi using 802.1X with EAP-TLS (user certificates).I have a question about how I should implement it. It might be a simple question, but currently I’m connected to a company access point. My idea...
Hi everybody,I am having an issue and I want to know the solution. Maybe updating to IOS-XE version 17.9.8 will solve the problem? C9200L_48 [2] C9200L-48T- Monitor Only Device is running an unsupported firmware version.Current version: IOS XE 17.12....
rebuilt a wireless controller from scratch because the original one was damaged and there was no backup available.I’m currently facing an issue with DHCP. The corporate SSID is working, but clients connected to it are receiving an IP address from the...
Is it possible that this version has a bug related to a 7-member stack? Or is it mandatory to power off the entire stack before closing the ring?I only connected the stacking cable to member 1, and as soon as I plugged it in, the whole stack reloaded...
Hi @MerakiGnome For the moment, we are only using native Meraki features. Do you have any ideas on how to deploy it using Meraki?At this time, we are not considering third-party solutions; nevertheless, if you think it would be better, we might consi...
Yes, my server is reachable from the WLC. I've checked the "DHCP Address Assignment Required" option and got the same result. Maybe if I set 0.0.0.0 in the Virtual IP, clients will receive the correct DHCP server address, or no? I can't pinpoint whe...
