About stefan-stefan

stefan-stefan · 08-31-2022

I was wondering if it is possible to prevent the X-Ironport headers from being created for outgoing mail ?I know I can use strip-headers but its a lot of headers to strip with every mail and thus would be nicer to not even create them.

stefan-stefan · 08-23-2022

I have found that certain companies that send email to us get blocked in our ESA by SPF SoftFail.And I dug into their SPF record with the help of some sites and they all say that SPF pass while the Cisco says SoftFail so I was a bit lost why.But afte...

stefan-stefan · 07-12-2009

Hello,This is probably going to be a very easy question for most of you but it would help me quite a bit.What I want on one of our 3560 series switches is to prevent any broadcast and multicast traffice going to a port.The reason for this is that the...

stefan-stefan · 05-05-2009

Hello,I have just received two GLC-SX-MM fiber optic modules to go into two 3560G-24PS-E's and I was wondering if I can do that with a running 3560G ?It would save me a lot of hassle if I can just plug it in with an active 3560G.Thanks!

stefan-stefan · 09-07-2022

I have succesfully used stripheaders but do would like it if there was a feature to at least strip out headers with things like internal IP addresses etc. No need to advertise internal infrastructure imho.Currenly am stripping out these :

stefan-stefan · 08-23-2022

Sorry my bad, but this is not about the syntax, its about the theorie of how the includes are interpreted (that was just a quick example).

stefan-stefan · 08-23-2022

Hmm, looking further into the include mechanism of the RFC I perhaps am thinking that Cisco is wrong (sorry for going back and forth).This I have from the RFC :+---------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | A recursive che...

stefan-stefan · 08-23-2022

Thank you @Steflstefan that was the info I was looking for So cisco is correct and lots of spf check sites aren't (which was to be expected perhaps). But I also think a lot of mail configs are wrong then potentially. This is a madeup example (eventh...

stefan-stefan · 08-09-2022

@sw-magdeburg Could it be that your version still has to receive the fix through the updater service for your new version ? (new to ESA/SMA so take my suggestion as from a newby)

Member Since	‎05-05-2009 12:56 AM
Date Last Visited	‎10-05-2022 12:31 AM
Posts	13
Total Helpful Votes Received	10

User Statistics

User Activity

Prevent X-Ironport headers from being created for outgoing mail

Order of includes in SPF records

ACL to block broadcast and multicast on one switch port

Fiber optic module with 3560G-24PS-E hot swappable ?

Re: Prevent X-Ironport headers from being created for outgoing mail

Re: Order of includes in SPF records

Re: Order of includes in SPF records

Re: Order of includes in SPF records

Re: SMA PVO 7025 SSL certificates