About Rommelbakje

Rommelbakje · 11-22-2013

Hello All,Installing 2 SG300 switches (latest firmware) in a small network gave me the following challenge:How can I bind an IP ACL to a VLAN instead of a physical port?The situation:- 1 central SG300-20 in layer 3 incuding trunk to L2 SG300-10.- 1 r...

Rommelbakje · 10-15-2012

Dear fellow techies and Cisco specialists,From a learning prespective I’ve accepted the challenge to design someone’s SB/Home hybrid network using an Cisco RV-180 and Cisco SG-300. I’m now preparing a setup for when I’ll be on-site to migratie from t...

Rommelbakje · 11-25-2013

Hi All,I forgot to mention I was using 1.3.0.62, wich does not seem to be the latest at this moment. 1.3.5.58 just came available. This answeres my question, however I’m still curious if using ACL’s without binding them is possible with 1.3.0.62! Re...

Rommelbakje · 11-24-2013

Hello Tom,Thank you for your response!My question is almost answered:-The ACL works for ingress traffic only which can be descriminated by several different methods. Since a SVI is the the VLAN interface, you can discriminate the subnet or specific I...

Rommelbakje · 10-23-2012

Thanks,You have got me on the right track! I Think I shouldn't make the situation more complex than it has to be. Tough, more complex means more to learn. About some of the (very helpful) answers:Switch ACL is ingress only...-------------------------...

Member Since	‎10-12-2012 08:53 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:55 AM
Posts	5

User Statistics

User Activity

SG300 IP ACL binding bug

Cisco SG-300 network design floorer

Re: SG300 IP ACL binding bug

Re: SG300 IP ACL binding bug

Re: Cisco SG-300 network design floorer