Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it might be a bad idea to use 'ip verify reverse-path interface outside' on the pix because any packet arriving inbound on the outside interface would need it's source checked, thus adding delay while trying to connect to...
Since I'm using Nat 0, I do not need any static statements on my inside interface, just a "nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0" command, no? If this is right, I can go ahead and delete some statics on the inside interface (someone else had configured ...
I have the command "ip verify reverse-path interface outside" configured on my PIX. According to documentation, the outside interface is protected by checking the source address and preventing ingress attacks. This basically means that packets coming...
Is there an easy way to retrieve the serial numbers from Aironet access points other than climbing into a ceiling and reading the serial number off the unit itself. Can I find it somewhere by using a command?
When setting up auth-proxy on an IOS router using the http server, how does the user access the webpage?Does it get pushed if he's not authenticated? Say an un-authenticated user loads up his PC and loads up his web-browser with www.cisco.com as his ...
I believe that if you have an access list that allows traffic to your inside interface that is using nat 0, then you need a static. I will test this later.
What if I have an access rule to something on the inside interface...I need a static then too, no?ex. (internal network = 12.18.1.x)----------------------------------nat (inside) 0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0conduit permit tcp 12.18.1.10 https anywould i then ne...
No, I want to do nat 0, but i'm asking do I need statics on the inside interface? I don't think I do since it's the highest interface and there is a nat 0 command associated with it.
