Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Dears,we have 3560 switch in the core and 2960 in the access layer, we have a new project for Cisco Wireless that will cover the whole building.the configuration of the switches are on the default that means the VLAN 1 on all ports and the subnet is ...
Dears;I have Catalyst 3560 in the core layer and 12 access switches (2960), all the configuration in the switches are default, i meant VLAN1 for all switches, the ASA firewall from the same subnet of the users 192.168.1.0 (VLAN1). The ASA IP address ...
Dears;we have three sites and connected together via VPN IPsec Site-to-Site full mesh, now we install a new exchange and domain controller in every site.we have an issue between site 1 and site 3 but we dont have any issue between site 1 and 2, 2 and...
Dears;I need a help in the design of Cisco Video Surveillance Solution. As you know we have four softwares for this solutions; CIVS-VSM Video Surveillance Manager v4.1/6.1 SW CIVS-MS Media Server v6.1 SoftwareCIVS-OM Operations Manager v4.1 Software ...
Dears;i have two Cisco ASA layers, and my exchange server is inside the network of the Layer 2, that means the traffic will pass the two ASA layers to reach the server. the first layer has a public IP addresses and between the two ASAs are Private su...
Yes, the internal firewall sees the exchange server 10.0.0.11 directly.there is no other device doing nat between the ASA and the exchange.yes i'm doing nat on both ASA.the nat is already enabled on both ASAs.Thanks;Kayo
Hi Federico;please find the drawing in the attached file. please note that i have natting in the internal firewall. as you recommend dont use multiple nat in the devices and disable the nat-control. how can i do this taking into our consideration the...
Dear Federico;if i disable the nat-control, how can the email IP address 10.0.0.1 to reach the first ASA which is 172.20.20.1. because we already have another natting on the internal firewall, if i disable the nat control, i think the natting of the ...
