About ricschaaf

ricschaaf · 08-09-2013

Switch ports look normal in all aspects. See below.On the firewall, I don't see any ARP entries for ...

ricschaaf · 08-09-2013

The routing table looks normal. Switch 172.23.31.6 was recently replaceddue to hardware failure, and...

ricschaaf · 08-07-2013

Anyone? Bueller?

ricschaaf · 07-19-2013

Can anyone tell me why I am getting these inconsistent traceroute results fromone switch? Why does s...

ricschaaf · 06-24-2007

Is there a way I can simulate having Vlan1be up without actually having a client on aport? I have (8...

ricschaaf · 06-23-2007

Will the no shut command do the same as if I connected a client to a port on Vlan1 ?

ricschaaf · 06-23-2007

Yes, there were no clients on any ports.It shows up once I connect a client to a Vlan1 port.I figure...

ricschaaf · 06-22-2007

Can anyone tell me why Vlan1 10.90.152.0/24 doesnot show up as directly connected in the routing tab...

ricschaaf · 06-21-2007

Looking at the network topology I don't know why feasibility condition would not be met. They are al...

ricschaaf · 06-20-2007

I'm curious why in this configuration all routes would not show a feasible successor in the topology...

ricschaaf · 06-20-2007

I lose ping to the 152_High net when I power down 152_Low. I don't know why. I would think that I co...

ricschaaf · 06-18-2007

The interfaces on THCC_1 stay up (except forthe one to 152_low of course). 152_High becomes unreacha...

ricschaaf · 06-18-2007

Hello Experts,I am trying to set up a ring in a lab but have oneissue with eigrp. (diagram attached)...

ricschaaf · 06-06-2007

Thanks.I've turned on EIGRP on both Test_1 and Test_2.It re-routes fine when I disconnect either (TH...

ricschaaf · 06-06-2007

No they are not.

Traceroute inconsistency from one switch