Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
We have several routers - 7201, 3825. On GE interfaces on all routers we see growing number of output drops even though inerfaces are highly underutilized. All speed/duplex settings are correct (mostly auto), on both side of link there are no etherne...
Hi all! We have mostly 2950 switches with standard image and 2950lre with EI. All switches in transparent modes with different domain names. Here is the problem cat1 <-trunk-> cat2 <-trunk> cat3 On cat1 and cat3 there are ports in ,let's say ,v...
Oh, i haven't thought that you might be on the same shared segment. In this case, yes, next-hop isn't changed. But I think your primary router doesn't even look at next-hop as it is discarding this update due to its own AS in as-path
Hi, Milan!No, it will not recieve update with its ip as next-hop. As my sending router will change it to itself according to eBGP rules, if it's eBGP peering, add its AS number and send it to all clients in dynamic-group. If originaly sending router ...
The answer to this issue with advertising routes back to eBGP (or, surprise, even back to iBGP RR-client!) is dynamic update groupshttp://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t4/feature/guide/gtbgpdpg.html
No, I think not, it stayed the same. when i do "show int gi0/0" I see flushes growing, but I've never seen more then 1 packet in queue (first number, size of queue). And "sh buffers input-interface gi0/0" shows nothing no matter how fast i hit "up an...
Well, we found out why we have output drops. We have several subinterfaces with rate-limits and this drops are from rate-limit drops Once we removed all rate-limits all drops are gone. Still we have flushes and playing with input queue had no succ...