Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Can you please tell me how to avoid reload a switch on a distribution image job?
according new features on Prime 3.10.3 Release Notes, Activate OFF on only distributing image is not possible anymore. Now customers are asking how to prepare an Upgrade...
Hi, I'm trying to implement cts manually with static sap keys but wonder to receive dynamicaly the policies from ISE. Everything seems to be configured but policies are not being received: I've just configuredon the Uplink Interface under the cts man...
Is it possible to perform SGT propagation only using cts manual with sap no-encapsulation keeping the enforcement? Ideia is on LAN Uplinks to use only SGT without any kind of macsec (authentication and/or encryption).
Thanks,
Nuno
Hello,I'm having some difficult to understand what realy means the output I get from "show licenses usage" regarding VDC-LICENSES on nexus 77K: Feature Ins Lic Status Expiry Date Comments ...
Hi,I have the following scennario:VLAN 1, 5, 10 etc. ---- Core 6500 MSFC ---- Vlan 2 ---- FWSM --- VLAN 4Everything goes well except when i try to ping from vlan 4 to vlan 1 and vice-versa. All the connectivity between vlan 4 and all the internal vla...
I'm insist independent on the number of the devices to be upgraded, me and customer are looking for a solution, using PI, if there is a possibility to only distribute an image without reload the device on that job, independent on the number of device...
doesnt matter. it depends on the upgrade needs of a specific customer. 1, 2, 10, 50 whatever. How can it be relevant to the limitation described before?
Hi KS,everything is fine with inspect and translations because i'm using the same rules between the vlan 4 and another internal vlan 100 for example!!!
Hi Andrew,This issue doesn't apply to my scenario!! The VLAN 1 is from the MSFC side and has nothing to do with FWSM as you can see from my first Post. So i don't need to add it to the vlan-group at MSFC.
Meanwhile i found some GUI logs that can point to the problem cause:2009-06-08 10:16:34,982 INFO [][pn.exchange.ExchangeConnection_impl] PN-1132: PnLogger messages initialized: pn.exchange.ExchangeConnection_impl2009-06-08 10:16:36,091 ERROR [][pn.e...