Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello,I need to setup a LAN-to-LAN VPN with an outside vendor and we are both using 192.168.80.0/24 on our internal networks. On my side I have an ASA5510 and I have dealt with conflicts many times before by working with the vendors to NAT across th...
Hello,I am in the middle of converting over to a LWAPP infrastructure as well as converting over to using the Cisco Secure Services Client.Because I have a very large number of IOS based AP's still in service that are running LEAP with CKIP, I have a...
We recently converted our LAN-to-LAN VPN's from Cisco 3005 VPN concentrators to ASA 5510's. Everything is working correctly, except for one thing.On the remote end of the tunnel, we have a Xyplex Terminal Server. When the tunnels were on the 3005's...
We have a VPN Tunnel established between a ASA5510 at our home office and a ASA5505 at a remote office. The tunnel is working properly, however the performance across the IPSEC tunnel is very poor. The tunnel is setup so that the remote 5505 sends ...
I had looked at that document as well, but that document has you perform NATs on both VPN devices which does not apply to my scenario.The previous post indicates that I can do it all myself without having the VPN device on the other side do any NATin...
Thanks for the advice. I am absolutely not opposed to telling them that they "have to" NAT their side as well. I just wanted to get some expert advice confirming that there was no easy way around it before I played hardball with them and letting th...
Does anyone know if the throttling down of G is specific to the AP or specific to the SSID? For example, if I have a secure G SSID that I can ensure will never have a B client on it, but I also have a public B/G SSID on the same AP, will the secure...
