Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hey all, I currently have 3 ASA5510's (versions 7.2(3), 8.0(4) and 8.2(1)) which fail to reply with the description value I added on the interface.I noticed the problem through our Cacti graphs and then checked with snmp-walk.I've tried both v1 and v...
Hey all, I recently upgraded this firewall to 9.01. Last week I tried to setup a port forwarding for a customers server. Done this before, did not expect any problems, but they appeared regardless of my expectations.The server is unable to access the...
Hi,We've recently setup our 5508 to work with Flexconnect. The 5508's run on 8.0.100, they are setup redundant. On the remote site we've setup a local dhcp pool for the various WLAN's/VLAN's. The AP's have registered with the WLC succesfully.We then ...
Hi All,Does anyone know how routers and ASA's deal with dns lookups for hostnames in their configuration?For instance, an NTP server (0.pool.ntp.org), or a hostname in a VPN tunnel configuration.I get the impression that there is only a 1 time resolv...
Hi Alexander,I don't think this is the issue, as I have other ASA's running the same software which do return IfAlias on a snmpwalk. Thanks for your reply though
Well, what can I say. Besides the excellent deduction on your part, I am once again baffled by the incompetance of the person managing the server.And finally, I should really stop making assumptions... Many thanks Jouni!!
Another thing I'm missing in the output, the bandwidth limit I impose is not checked.I checked another 1-on-1 port mapping on another 5510 using 8.6(1)2, I get significantly different order and items in the result of a comparable packet-tracer.
The 8000 port is probably a mix up. I must have performed an earlier packet-tracer with that port. Performing the same packet-tracer with the 9000 ports yields port 9000 in the results.
Hi Jouni, Thank you for your swift response.The object WAN-IP-DOOGLE1 was used, but I later replaced the object with the ip address in the nat statement.Attached is the packet-tracer you wanted to see, including the result of the questions you posed....
