Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
HiWhen the source of your span is (for example) a multi-gig port-channel, how do you send this to your destination if you are not able to configure a port-channel for a destination?For example, if you have 4 ports that comprise the source port-channe...
Hopefully a quick question for someone:I have a requirement to guarantee 100Mb of bandwidth over my WAN for a particular protocol.I've noticed on the 4507R (running 12.2(54)) that I am unable to config a class-map with "match port" (my protocol is no...
HiI have a pair of 4507Rs, each with a pair of SUP-IVs. I have configured sso redundancy mode. It fails over correctly.My problem is weird...When I test resiliency I pull the primary Supervisor engine. When I do this, although the secondary takes ...
Hi all,We have a basic 4 site WAN. Our WAN links are all 1GB.We run EIGRP between each site, and within each site.We are moving our infrastructure model which will mean quite a lot of applications will be remote, located accross the WAN. As such, t...
HiCan anyone point me to cisco qos documentation specific to microbursts?I would like to create a qos policy for certain multicast traffic that, by its nature, microbursts quite frequently, up to 1Gb/s. Whilst I have 1Gb wan links, I want to make su...
So here's what I ended up doing...Specifically I wanted to guarantee bandwidth for an app. Instead of using bandwidth (which isnt available on the sup4) Ive used DSCP and assigned EF to the app to guarantee it is prioritised. (we dont have voip on t...
Hi.It was only when I tried using another 6-port line card that my problem went away. Cisco believe the problem is the phys port on the line card, and not either supervisor module.
