Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
hi, I currently have a PIX 506 in a test environment and am trying to come up with a solution for the following. I am trying to use NAT in a rather unorthodox way.two networks, 10.5.1.0/24 on the inside and 172.26.224.0 on the outside. The PIX 506 ...
I am currently thinking about using load balancing on two EIGRP enabled links. I don't want to use per packet LB.The problem I have is that I would like to double my throughput for FTP traffic to a specific destination. So I want to use per packet ...
Can someone please tell me if a document exists that clearly makes a comparison between these two systems. There seems to be a huge difference in cost, but no clear mention what benefits (beside number of agents and improved CTI)the Enterprise has o...
The company I work for has a number of remote branches that are only able to route traffic on a 10.1.xxx.xxx network. A requirement to allow these branches to connect to a public IP (port 2700) is proving somewhat of a headache - since the routes are...
Hi, yes it is a little confusing. I have a network 172.26.224.0 on the outside with statics to translate 172.26.224.0 addresses into inside 10.5.x.x inside addresses. This works fine.Now I have a client on the inside say 10.5.1.1. I want this clien...
