Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
[ Apologies, but I don't know if there's a way to make a single discussion appear in more than one area. ]I'm having trouble with dual-stack over PPPoA xDSL on a c887; full description of problem over at: https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3298...
My ISP is *starting* to roll out native-v6, quiet-like, and I'm trying to get it running in the ADSL-connected home-lab.However, for some reason, PPP link setup fails for v6; v4 is fine, as always. The argument which seems to be sent from IPV6CP as t...
That document points to a netflow implementation that was removed in 12.4(20)T according to its Table 1, so it's no longer very helpful for a growing number of admins.I'm currently failing to understand whether (and on what devices) IPv6 netflow is s...
What you're seeing is just another variant of the :: expansion rule.2001:db8:2:2::1/64expands to2001:db8:2:2:0:0:0:1 with 64 bits of network.Note that in the real world, 6to4 addresses always begin with 2002:, as the entire 2002::/16 space is granted...
I tend to agree, given that my c887 can't negotiate the same DHCP-based address in v6 as it can from v4 on my ISP.The critical component of v6 support is only available in the extra-cost "Advanced IP Services" feature set.If Cisco is serious about v6...
Apparently, IPv6 over PPPoX is an Advanced IP Services feature, and isn't included in the Advanced Security IOS load which is the default for c8xx devices.I got a key for Advanced IP Services, and I have the desired functionality on 15.1(3)T.Whether ...
