02-21-2011 10:17 AM - edited 03-01-2019 05:25 PM
[ Apologies, but I don't know if there's a way to make a single discussion appear in more than one area. ]
I'm having trouble with dual-stack over PPPoA xDSL on a c887; full description of problem over at:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3298254?tstart=0#3298254
I'll watch replies in both places.
I'd also *gladly* rejigger/retract one or the other post if someone would like the discussions merged and can advise as to how to do it.
-jml
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-22-2011 11:06 AM
Hi John,
I also found this reported sw issue internally. IPV6CP is failing. Cisco has been working on multiple fronts to help our customers for smooth IPv6 integration/transition. I would recommend you to worh with Cisco TAC for resolution and also contact your Cisco Account and/or Services team.
Good luck!
Regards,
Salman
02-22-2011 03:55 AM
Apparently, a known bug.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3298461#3298461
Severity 3 - "minor features do not work at all"
Guess that says something about where v6 is at. Hope there's a fix released for my ISR before 8 June 2011.
-jml
02-22-2011 11:06 AM
Hi John,
I also found this reported sw issue internally. IPV6CP is failing. Cisco has been working on multiple fronts to help our customers for smooth IPv6 integration/transition. I would recommend you to worh with Cisco TAC for resolution and also contact your Cisco Account and/or Services team.
Good luck!
Regards,
Salman
02-23-2011 08:57 AM
TAC gave me the BugId, no apparent fixed version available (at least for my device class).
I registered for update notifications on the bug. Hopefully that'll tell me when it becomes available.
-jml
02-27-2011 08:55 AM
Apparently, IPv6 over PPPoX is an Advanced IP Services feature, and isn't included in the Advanced Security IOS load which is the default for c8xx devices.
I got a key for Advanced IP Services, and I have the desired functionality on 15.1(3)T.
Whether fairly basic IPv6 CPE funcitonality should be "Advanced" rather than base functionality in a post-IANA-v4-exhaustion world is another question. I'd sure like to see it in base functionality, personally. I don't need a lot of the v6 features, but basic end-network/branch office capabilities such as v6 address over PPPoX negotiation, RA, filtering, and v6 administrative support would sure be nice to see in the base release.
-jml
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide