Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have several vlans running on a 4510R, but I have confusion on one of them.When I do a sh vlan brief everything looks fine, the vlan in question (vlan99) is active and has 4 ports assigned to it. When I do a sh int desc, however, vlan99 shows 'admi...
I am restricting throughput speeds on a connection using policy-maps on a subnet with police rules. While this works to restrict download speeds to the desired amount, it does nothing to restrict upload speeds. I had thought the service-policy output...
I want to extend my LAN by connecting a 2960 to my in place 4510. Can this be done as a simple daisy chain through one of the existing ports,(say Gi8/48) connected to an uplink port on the 2960? Or do I need to use the uplink port on the supervisor o...
Looking for a little help in why a newly created Vlan shows down/down when I issue a sh ip int brief command.My setup is an AP with two SSIDs on two different Vlans (4 and 7). Traffic flows properly across Vlan 4, but Vlan 7 shows it is in a down sta...
Rich re-stated my confusion accurately. Sorry for not explaning my problem better!Joe and Glen's information for the SVI being unecessary for the two hosts to communicate cleared my confusion. With the SVI for vlan99 shutdown, the two hosts will not ...
They are. That still leaves me with my issue. I thought the service-policy input/output pointing back to the policy-map on the interface was the proper method. Where did my thought process go wrong?
I can see where you say that. I'm only allowing traffic to certain locations, because I don't want initiating traffic coming those locations to gain access. I am allowing all other taffic (with deny excpetions) with the ip any any. I thought I was be...
My GUEST ACL only has permits and denies to limit what resouces and time ranges are allowed, but is not sensitive to direction.For example: (IPs changed to protect the innocent)ip access-list extended GUEST permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps time...
Wouldn't that limit the traffic on all my subnets? I only want to limit the traffic on the /1.3 subnet, but leave the the others (/1.1, /1.2, /1.4, etc) to have full access.