Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I want to deploy a WLAN over a campus with a large number of buildings (3000+ users). On the whole campus there should be the same SSID so that no matter where people go, they always perceive the WLAN as "the same".Now, of course I do not want to mak...
When a guest wlan user is created (by the LobbyAdmn function) there I get back a pop-up box with her autogenerated password. This is normally a rather complex password. Is there any way to print this with e.g. a label printer so that I can give it to...
Dear all,we followed the instructions on how to enable anyconnect for IPv6. They seem to be dated since they mention that ASDM does not support IPv6 but it does.The problem is as follows: when an anyconnect client connects to the external IPv6 addres...
Dear all,I ahve a problem with NAT on stick which I cannot resolve. Basically the internal client(s) 172.31.80.55 (see attached diagram) is accessing the IP address 1.1.1.227. The destination should get translated from 1.1.1.227 into 10.10.118.227 an...
Dear all,is there any way to intyerconnect a Cisco 6509 (which only takes XENPACK interfaces to my knowledge) with a NEXUS 7000 which only takes SFP+ interfaces with 10GB speed? What could I do here to be future proof?--Joerg
Hi Rob,thanks for the advice that almost solved my problem. We have a WCS but use it for monitoring only. How does the WiSM learn from the WCS that a new visitor account has been created? Does the LobbyAdmin need to apply a config or so?Thx,--Joerg
Aaron,that is certainly true. But, what we observe is t hat if there is a higher WLAN client denisty (6 to 12 clients) on a 1252 AP powered with 15.4W only we get messages in the WCS saying "AP XY draws low power" and clients are disconnected arbitra...
Thanks, I will get the configs together in the new year. There is an if 172.31.80.X but I said on this if "ip nat outside" whilst I said on the loopback-if "ip nat inside". Could this be wrong?--Joerg
Dear all,I want to note that in rev 8.0(4) there seem to be two distinct problems.1. HTTP on non standard ports (which means not port 80) is slow, no matter which policy map (no inspect basic threats, no inspect http) etc. you apply or deactivate.2. ...
