Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello together, are there any knowm issues on compatibility for the original Cisco SFP-10G-SR-S and the C9500 Series switches? We have the problem, that the inserted SFP+ are recognized as 1000BaseZX SFP and are in a non-functional state. Working C95...
Hi guys! after editing and adding one new policy to our ruleset the ACS all my policies are deleted. I found an field notice FN-64144 and a bug notice CSCuz48986 describing this strange behaviour. Two additional discussions belonging to this Bug are ...
HelloI tried to update my ACS 5.1 appliance. I applied patch 5.1.0.44.3 and made an big mistake: I booted the server due to the fact that it was not reachable after one hour after appplying the patch. Now the server shows following message, when I tr...
Sorry, I only posted the output of the idprom. I didn't took pictures from them. As you can read, they were wrong branded and identified as "GE-ZX" NAME: "TwentyFiveGigE1/0/48", DESCR: "GE ZX"PID: SFP-10G-SR , VID: V03 , SN: AVD2231D3TE NAME: "Twenty...
Thanks everyone for discussing this topic. The SFP+ are wrong branded, original Cisco SFP+. All defective SFP+ are replaced now and the new original ones are working - by the way they are now from Finisar, instead of Cisco Avago. I don't know why Cis...
Leo, thats an output of working ones at the USA from the same manufacturer: IDPROM for transceiver TwentyFiveGigabitEthernet1/0/21: Description = SFP or SFP+ optics (type 3) Transceiver Type: = ...
Hello Leo, that's the output of the command: IDPROM for transceiver TwentyFiveGigE1/0/27: Description = SFP or SFP+ optics (type 3) Transceiver Type: = GE ZX (23) Product Identifier (PID) ...
We have installed a workaround by using thirdparty modules now, but we have installed the failing modules as well, so a TAC case can be opened on them. Kind regards Stefan
