Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,
I have an ASAv Firewall. My goal is to combine a couple of interfaces into a logical port channel.
When I enter config mode and go into an interface the channel-group command is not there.
Wondering what I'm not doing, besides not being smart ?
...
Hi,
I currently have two cisco routers configured with a connection to a primary WAN inerface and a connection to an Internet interace. I have a VPN configured using a VTI interface as a secondary path if the primary WAN circuit goes down. Im also us...
Hello All,I have a customer with three buildings all very close to each other MM 62.5 fiber backbone. They've outgrown there current topology and I'm looking at implementing a distribution layer using a couple of either 3750's or 3850's. They've alr...
Hello,Ive been trying to learn some more about NAT configuration on the ASA. I have a lab set up with an ASA and Im configuring Auto NAT object NAT (section2 of the NAT table). This question is really about configuring the direction (outside,dmz1) or...
Hello,Ive been trying to get a better understanding of Auto NAT (objectNAT) and Manual NAT by configuring it on an ASA. I noticed that if I configure AutoNAT (object NAT) as below the NAT rule appears in section 2 Auto NAT. ciscoasa(config-network-ob...
Thanks for your guidance. I'm using the ASAv in a GNS environment, I'd set up a lab and wanted to configure EtherChannel between the Firewall and a IOSv switch. Your comments makes sense.
Thanks for the support.
Andy
Hi Rick,
I do have OSPF configured as the routing protocol between the sites. Your comment "The main thing to watch out for in that environment is that you do not want the dynamic routing protocol to advertise the tunnel destination address as reacha...
Hello Richard,
Thanks for the guidance. I think I'll be configuring a full mesh, no hub. So on each router Id create two tunnels, Tunnel0 and Tunnel1. Router 1 would have Tunnel0 going to Router2 and Tunnel1 going to Router 3, is that correct?
Thanks...
