Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I love Meraki for branch solutions and campus solutions but i am wondering if people are seeing a mix at the campus. Mostly Catalyst switches with some Meraki added in simply because of better lead times. How has that gone for your customers?
I had trouble getting my CSS 11051 to insert cookies into the packets destined for the client (tac looked at the config and said it was good). After some changes on the server everything started working. Is there anything a server can do that will ...
Are all classification and marking options on the MSFC 2 (layer 3) of a 6509 for local L3 processing only? I can not get the classification to appear at Layer 2 of the 6509. I have set the default ACL at layer 2 to trust-dscp and if I make QOS ACLs...
I love Meraki for branch solutions and campus solutions but i am wondering if people are seeing a mix at the campus. Mostly Catalyst with some Meraki added in simply because of better lead times. How has that gone for your customers?
It is not repeatalbe since the servers were rebooted.I tried with and without adding the RFC command before and after the failure. It had no effect. I do have a trace file, i will email it to you.
The first packet in a new stream should go to layer 3. I do not see that packet marked. Also the class-map defining traffic to be marked was getting hits - as seen by a show command.