Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Question Nusrat,1. Is there any particular reason why a 228.x.x.x is being used for local mcast?2. are there any packets being dropped everytime you test mcast pings?#sh controller ether-controller [int](tip:- clear counters for controller before tes...
Hey Daniel,It's difficult to say whether static multicast mac is the solution without knowing what's is the problem but we can continue to break it down. Sometimes, simple steps can help eliminate certain conditions but it seems that you are restrict...
Hi Daniel,Firstly, I'd like to check what platform/version you are running. Example, IOS 6500 switches will constrain unknown multicast by default. For multicast to be "known", there would be the need for a "multicast router" or similar function suc...
That's great news Thomas!By design, today, a MAC access-list does not match on IPv4 packets (this may change if there's new capabilities added to this feature)IPv4 packets are recognised at layer 2 by the ethertype 0x0800, and you'll see this in the ...
Hi Nate,Just wanted to get some clarity on how you confirmed the packet arrived at the router and also, what test did you use to generate this traffic? eg. ICMP vs TCP connection tests using Debug w/ACL on the routerI'm thinking of two scenarios at t...
