Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, Does anyone know of a commercial tool to measure network bandwidth utilization, but without requiring access to the network devices? Namely, a tool to be installed on a LAN, which would measure the utilization of the LAN and potentially the WA...
Hello,I noticed that on the 881 router, the lowest sustained burst value is only 25ms. However, on the 871, the lowest value is 10ms. The issue is that 10ms is the recommended value for voice traffic. So far, I haven't had any luck with finding any d...
I configured a 3072 kbps multilink interface with a service-policy where LLQ was allocated 2000 kbps. Now everytime the router reboots and one of the T1's in the multilink bundle is unavailable, the router removes the service policy from the multilin...
When I redistribute an external route from OSPF into RIP, the route loses its tag value when I check the RIP router's routing table. So, in order for the specific tag to exist in RIP, I have to specifically reassign the tag value in the redistributio...
I have a question about using static routes with DHCP.I understand that a static default route pointing to an interface, as the next hop, will generate superfluous ARP entries for every destination. So, with that in mind, will the static route (A) be...
I agree that the best solution for a multilink service-policy is to assign LLQ bandwidth by percentages. So, I will implement this solution. Thanks for the suggestions.
That makes sense! I just reproduced this test scenario and the results reflected the size of the field requirements. In the test, I routed the tag in the opposite direction where I inserted the tag at RIP and it successfully reached EIGRP.In other wo...
That's a great point, however I was using a tag value of "999". So just to be safe I changed the tag to "9", but to no avail. Despite the change, the tag did not appear on the RIP router. Same outcome.
