Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi. I was trying to modify the logging on a Cisco 5520 ASA so that the only thing the buffer would show was VPN related login info for when users logged into or off of the VPN. I started with this:logging list VPN-Log level informational class vpnclo...
I have two Cisco 5520's: One is connected to an ISP that we are migrating from and one connected to an ISP that we are migrating to. All external services have been migrated to the new firewall. However, I an having issues with Remote Desktop to an F...
I am trying to set up a new WAP in a remote facility. This set-up is a mirror of the setup that we have in our corp office (with obvious differences that are site specific). I am trying to configure this so that there are two VLANs. VLAN 10 is set sp...
I just set up an L2 port channel for testing purposes to a server using two GigE links. Both of the interfaces are showing up/up and passing traffic, and seem to be load-balancing correctly, but the port-channel interface is showing down/down. The co...
I recently joined a small company that had all user, server and voice traffic in a single VLAN. The subnetting went something like this:VLAN 1 - 172.16.4.x/22Since starting, I began a migration to get all user, server and voice traffic segmented to t...
I changed the GigE interfaces to the 802.3ad standard and the port-channel interface came up. However, I changed it back to PAgP and forced the interface up and it is still showing down/down on the port-channel interface, but the physical interfaces ...
To clarify further, the configuration on the port channel interface is pretty basic. However, the server that this port channel is going to is a Dell. They specified an Intel program to create a NIC teaming on the server itself. When we use the 802.3...
I think the issue may be this. Here is a base configuration for migrated ports:interface FastEthernetx/x/x description Port xxxxx switchport access vlan 128 switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q switchport trunk native vlan 128 switchport mode trunk s...
I re-checked the VLAN interfaces and the new VLANs (VLAN 128 and 130) are both configured with the correct subnet masks (/23 and /24 respectivly). All devices that have not been migrated are on the old 172.16.4.x/22 subnet. As for the VLAN interfaces...
If that's the case, other than looking at it on a port-by-port basis, how I would be able to do any traffic analysis. Also, there doesn't seem to be any speed difference on things like file transfers after the migration. I know the backplane of the s...
