Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello all, I was using NSO 5.3.0.1 for almost a year and it was working great. The main usage was to allow other scripts to leverage the parsing/interaction that NSO provides to give a consistent experience no matter the end device. Most of the time,...
Two (hopefully easy) questions on compliance reporting in NSO:1) How can I check for compliance on something that is "not" configured, explicitly?I have run compliance checks for, for instance, NTP servers against a device template, and it works for ...
This is probably a basic question so I apologize if it's something I should have figured out on my own, but I can't seem to find a definitive reason why ncclient and netconf-console are different in how they handle the XML payload. I have some script...
Hmm I think my issue might have been using the keyword/command "device" instead of "devices" :). Thanks for the follow up. At least I'm able to continue to use my existing scripts now with a downgrade to 5.3.3, but if i have to go to 5.4 and this is ...
FYI, a downgrade to 5.4.1 did not work. I didn't attempt 5.4.0 or any of its maintenance releases, but I did go for 5.3.3 and that works (after recompiling the NEDs, of course).
Sorry, that won't work either. It comes back with "show device" and then a line saying "syntax error: unknown argument" - my guess is that passing escape characters to the echo inside of the ssh session doesn't work. Thanks for the suggestion, though...
Just to be comprehensive in this question in case others search this question, yes you can also ask NSO to check for if an element explicitly does NOT exist with the tags solution suggested by gmuloche. While you can't necessarily check for "any" mis...
Ah, sorry, I missed that part, I had assumed that you were doing more of a template-apply and seeing if it changed lines. Now I see it's part of the compliance check itself. I'll look into that, thanks, I think that could work as well.
