Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I have a one chassis Catalyst 6504-E with 2 x SUP-720-10G working in SSO mode. My understanding was that the supervisor WAN interfaces are only configurable on the active supervisor and they are replicated to the standby supervisor. It looks like ...
Hello,
I'm observing a strange behavior on the router while VPNed with ASA. I have a simple site-to-site VPN between a router 1921 (remote site) behind NAT and with dynamic public IP address on the modem and 2 ASA5525's in Active-Active configuration...
Hello everybody,
While preparing a test bed for a customer before implementing PfRv3 solution I stumbled upon quite odd behavior of the border routers when an TCA is generated after simulating an impairment on the WAN network.
At the moment I hav...
Hello everybody,
While preparing a test bed for a customer before implementing PfRv3 solution I stumbled upon quite odd behavior of the border routers when an TCA is generated after simulating an impairment on the WAN network.
At the moment I hav...
Hi BB and thank you for your comments. What I need to achieve is to redirect the AnyConnect connection requests to different port over same public IP address based on the FQDN prefix, say ac01.domain.com would go over to IP address 1.1.1.1 and port 4...
True and it would be interesting to verify that in the lab. The carriers will connect directly to the supervisors so no other switch option in front of the chassis. I will test that and let you know. Although running BGP with the carriers and priorit...
Thank you Mark. Yes I had the same thought to go with EEM and already did some test. Here I would need to have one EEM script for when the primary carrier goes down to switch over to the secondary carrier and another EEM script for when an active sup...
