Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Currently remote 9371 (PU5 old IBM mini-mainframe) traffic is encapsulated via STUN which is then de-encapsulated at the data center STUN router and traffic is then forwarded to the 3745 FEP. The 3745 FEP will be eliminated next year and would like t...
Martin,Just to clarify;a. The link will be 1 Mbps. Does LFI still help?b. If ATM PVC then use two PVCs. c. If Frame Relay then use one PVC with FRF.12 fragmentation. In either b or c, QoS still needed to guarantee good voice quality. Do you agree?...
Using 1720 routers, 12.2(29) IOS to test 9371 over DLSw, and configuring routers as shown in the document, DLSw circuit will not come up when configuring SDLC router role for none, secondary, and primary. When SDLC router role is configured for none ...
Dan,Per your advise, the topology that might work is as follows:zOS1.3/CS1.3------->3640/DLSw+-------->3640/DLSw+------>9371If you can provide sample configs (router and vtam) that would be great.thanks again for expert advise.Mario
The operating system of the 9371 is VSE/ESA 1.4.3 and VTAM release V3R4. Can z390 (NN/DLUS)------> 3640 (NN/DLUR)------>9371 (PU5) work? If not, why not?How can I reach you?
Ray,The FEP is channel connected to a M/F which has OSA adapters. No the 9371 can't be configured as APPN node nor LEN? We tried in the LAB to use DLSw+ to transport 9371 datastream but was not successful. STUN work fine. However, STUN uses the FEP ...
