Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi all, Have a question regarding the forms that you publish in Outlook with the TMSXE integration. How do you change the icon and name, we would like to change it from a "folder" icon andthe name from "Cisco". So that the image and name represents T...
Hi all, I have a question regarding the TMSXE integration in Exchange. Currently when scheduling a meeting through the Forms plug-in, exchage will send a normal calender booking to the partipants, but without the information for connectivity at the m...
Hi all, Setting up a VCSC-VCSE and able to dial out and internal between EPs. But when a external EP is trying to call in i recieve this in search history logs for calls. Search (177) State: CompletedFound: FalseReason: Not FoundInfo: Policy Response...
Hi all, Customer has previously invested in a VCSE starterpack and are now about to add a MCU 4210 and TC. So would like to check the ports used for registering to a VCSE through a firewall, found the below ports on Cisco site, but would like to conf...
Hi all, Are about to setup an enviroment with 2 TMS pointing to the same SQL db. It's currently up and running, however, TMS02 had some communication problems through the firewall, seems to be getting some communication over UDP/1434, but even though...
True, but we are recieving the same problem when recieving calls from external EPs. The local reg EP was registered on the VCSE, trying to talk to a EP on the VCSC. // Johan
I've looked through the invites and it does seem to be the NAT problem overwriting, so trying to figure out what would be the best way of solving this. NAT LIC or NAT reflect ( i think it was called)Thanks for your help!// Johan
Hi, On the VCSE there will be end-points registrating using assent, both on inside and outside the firewall. Sw version will be x7.2 and 4.3. Hopefully we will be able add a VCSC instead of this solution, might put the MCU on public instead, but eith...
