Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Does anyone know if Cisco will support mixing EMI and SMI in a 3750 stack? I keep hearing mixed things--some say yes and some say no. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I don't really want to pay for EMI on switches that don't uplink to the co...
I am really trying to push L3 in the closet using 3750s. However, it is very frustrating when the most basic stuff (i.e. multicast routing) is not supported in the IPBASE image--but I hear this is supposed to change in an upcoming release. Upgradin...
Hi Alessio, we would mainly be looking for Microsoft Lync traffic by inspecting the payload. Are you saying once the service is identified then the CPU drops? We will have links from 2-30Mbps. We are also using SRE-910 for WAAS and I assume that ...
You can probably do this with a VACL. It would look something like the following:ip access-list ALLOW-MGT 5 deny icmp 1.1.1.1/32 any 6 deny tcp 2.2.2.2/32 gt 1023 any eq 22 30 permit ip any any vlan access-map ALLOW-MGT match ip address ...
There are a lot of tunnels. Probably the one you are dealing with is a GRE tunnel. GRE stands for Generic Route Encapsulation. If you look at your configuration and you see a tunnel interface, it is a GRE tunnel. As for the different ways to hand...
Actually, my buddy said they would never do it--too much of a headache to support. Yes, you will load balance the traffic. But, as you say, it is 4 individual links and not one link--a very distinct difference.
According to a friend of mine that worked at a large local provider, this can be done but the provider has to support it obviously since you would probably use MLPPP to aggregate the link.HTH.
