About Rajesh cisco

Rajesh cisco · ‎10-11-2018

Thank you so much Abi. can you point me good link on YDK guide.

Rajesh cisco · ‎10-11-2018

Hi , I was look at the Yang data model for MPLS LDP and trying to write a yang file based on this. Before that, I just wanted to know is there any way to generate yang file based on the yang model. Basically, I wanted to avoid the manual work. refer data model: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-yang-04.txt Sample Yang file: https://github.com/YangModels/yang/blob/master/vendor/cisco/xe/1632/mpls-ldp.yang Please let me know. thanks.

Rajesh cisco · ‎08-07-2014

Hi team, Have few doubts on round trip time of PING utility. Actually am not sure how RTT is calculated. i mean min/avg/max values. is there any algorithm available ? please share if any RFC available ? i know RTT is delay between source and destination ack. i am not sure how MIN/AVG/MAX calculated. please help me on this. thanks rajesh kumar V

Rajesh cisco · ‎08-06-2014

Hi team, Have few doubts on round trip time of PING utility. Actually am not sure how RTT is calculated. i mean min/avg/max values. is there any algorithm available ? please share if any RFC available ? i know RTT is delay between source and destination ack. i am not sure how MIN/AVG/MAX calculated. please help me on this. thanks, Rajesh kumar V

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-26-2014

thanks karthi. i will check and update u.

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-26-2014

example: R1# sh ip route 2.2.2.0 Routing entry for 2.2.2.0/24 Known via " static ", distance 1 , metric 0 (connected) Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 12.12.12.2 Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 directly connected, via Serial0/1

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-26-2014

thanks a lot karthi. what you said is exactly correct for Administrative Distance (AD). my doubt is in metric point. can we set 0 as a metric for static route ? if yes , how we are determining. thanks Rajesh kuamr V

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-26-2014

Thanks karthi. So, Basically we cannot use 0 as metric for directly connected route. In that case we cannot use 0 as the metric for static route too ?. I see that many router manufactures use metric 0 (ad=1 metric=0 [1/0]) for static routes and also standard mention that non valid metric is -1 and not 0. thanks Rajesh.

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-26-2014

Hi All, Thanks for sharing. i have another question. what was the metric of local route by default. can i set that to 0 ? please confirm.

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-25-2014

Any comments really helpful for me . please share your points. thanks Rajeshkumar V

Rajesh cisco · ‎06-25-2014

Hi Floks, i have basic doubt on metric calculation of the routes in cisco routers. what was the default metric value for static routes ? How it is calculated ? Please share me if there is any link for reference. thanks and regards, Rajesh Kumar V

Rajesh cisco · ‎03-06-2014

thanks jon. now i got clarified. thanks agian.

Rajesh cisco · ‎03-06-2014

Any suggestion very much appreciated.

Rajesh cisco · ‎03-06-2014

Hi Team, i have static RP for a group range (225.0.0.0 to 255.0.0.0) and i have configured dynamic RP (bootstrap mechanism) for the same group range. which one will be elected as RP-SET. please share your views. thanks a lot in advance. regards, Rajesh kumar V

Rajesh cisco · ‎12-12-2013

Hi all, I tried a topolgy R1->R2->R3->R1. DF election not happening when RP address is in same network ( DF ). kindly share more info on election process . thanks arun/rajesh

Date Registered	‎04-09-2013 12:27 AM
Date Last Visited	‎10-11-2018 06:21 PM
Total Messages Posted	18
Total Helpful Votes Received	1

Re: How to generate yang file using yan...

How to generate yang file using yang da...

RTT Round trip time ?

RTT Round trip time ?

thanks karthi.i will check

example:R1#sh ip route 2.2.2

thanks a lot karthi.what you

Thanks karthi.So, Basically

Hi All,Thanks for sharing.i

Any comments really helpful

Default Metric value for static routes ...

Static RP Configuration PIM vs Candidat...

Static RP Configuration PIM vs Candidat...

Static RP Configuration PIM vs Candidat...

PIM BI-Directional DF election not work...