Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Over and over my coworker and I debate the whole "client has weaker Tx power than AP" topic. We have strived to turn our AP Tx power levels down to match our client's Tx power level -- 13dBm. However, in the back of my mind, is a concept I heard from...
Experts, does anyone know if there is a way to clear the candidate WLC list without using the factory defaults reset? I have found the list of "remembered" WLCs to be troublesome, and would like to clear the list if possible.
Does anyone know what feature is causing this? My customer is extremely detail oriented and I'm trying to find an answer.Directory of disk0:/ 4 drw- 0 Oct 25 2013 15:29:44 -05:00 ORPHAN1 9 -rw- 55143 Jul 29 2013 15:03:22 -0...
I ran across this while studying for the BCMSN:"Any untagged frames that an 802.1Q trunk receives will be forwarded to any ports in the native VLAN, which could be a security issue. This issue can be avoided by assigning an unused VLAN number to the ...
Back to the top....trying to resurrect this one to see if anyone has an answer for the Nearby AP Statistics question. Is this from the AP's perspective or from the client's perspective?
Thank you for the responses guys. I really like to think things through. So why do you think Cisco includes that bit about the Tx power setting when specifying receiver sensitivity? Is receiver sensitivity inclusive of the Tx power setting?
That command might, work. I will have to give it a try. Specificially, we "stage" APs on a local WLC to give it a name, label it, get the firmware downloaded, make sure it is not DOA, etc.. Then, we ship the AP to the final site location. Everything...
Thanks Jon.Another thing I was curious about; is there any reason to trunk on a link when you only have one VLAN? That is the pratice we follow too and I am just wondering what is the premise behind that.
