Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Getting this on a Cisco 3110 after about 10 minutes:Last login: Wed Oct 8 18:32:03 UTC 2025 fromSuccessful login attempts for user Last login: Wed Oct 8 19:04:32 2025 fromCopyright 2004-2024, Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.Cisco is ...
I have a PIX 506E running with 2 VLANs and for some reason on the logical interface I can't communicate with hosts in the same subnet. The physical interface is good, all hosts talk properly. The networks are autonomous and are not to talk to each ...
I'm just looking for clarification on this point: Once you setup a TACACS+ server in the CVPN you can no longer use the local admin user database? Is this permanent? Is a factory default the only way to get the ability to use the local admin datab...
I have to migrate a PIX to a different IP block on the outside interface. Unfortunately, my only means of connection is via SSH on the outside interface. How is it possible to change the outside IP and default route without losing my SSH session by...
xxxxx.xxxxx.com ProxySG: 60003 WCCP has been initialized(0) NORMAL_EVENT ../cag_main.cpp 570I've been geeting this on our network alot but, we don't have WCCP enabled on any of the routers or switches. Just seems unusual that something is trying to ...
I'm seeing this same behavior in one of our 5512-X, ver 9.12(3)12 as well. If I revert the code to the 9.8 train netflow works as expected out the MGMT interface. I ran PCAP's on the port the ASA was on and no packets destined for our netflow server ...
I had this happen on plain Jane ASA5505's. Hangs at boot. Sometimes resolved by a simple power cycle and others a console connection was needed to adjust the bootvar to the previous code.
Correct, but the DHCP scope was in the other /25 network...so, yeah it was handing out IPs but they were in the .129-.254 range with a /24 so they could see the PIX as it had the CORRECT mask but, as for the servers that lived in the first half of th...
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner.I should have config'ed the servers network settings myself as they had a few of them at a /25...that's the last time I take someone's word that they are "configured properly" for the network settings.I knew there ...
That's exactly what has me scratching my head about this...I also noticed this in the logs:no route to host 192.168.1.10 from 192.168.1.5Which is odd because the 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 networks are directly connected and have their routes ...
