Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I can't find anything on CCO or Google to explain the 'check==378' in the output below. router#sh access-list 1Standard IP access list 1permit 10.25.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255 check=378This is just a snippet. Other ACLs on the same router do not ha...
Is there a way to remove the VTP domain name on an IOS-based Catalyst switch without resetting?In 'vlan database' mode I have tried the following which do NOT work:no vtp domain XYZno vtp domainvtp domain ""vtp domain NULL(now you have the string 'NU...
Problem: possible PIX routing table conflictReplaced existing routes but new routes are not taking effect. I want traffic bound for 10.67.77.222 to be routed to the PIX outside but it consistently builds a connection to the inside and gives a 'no rou...
I have a customer who wants to allow EIGRP through the PIX. I have tried this in my lab (one router on PIX inside and another router on PIX outside) and can't get it to work. I also put the two routers on the same subnet (changed the IP address of on...
1. You cannot have the same priority on both sides (priority 95) - one priority must be higher so it is clearly the Active router.2. Assuming that normal traffic flows through the Primary router via Fa0/0 and Gi0/0, then if Gi0/0 fails the secondary ...
Francois,Thanks very much for the detailed answer. That is exactly what I wanted to know - it can't be done without resetting all VTP parameters. This is not a problem in our environment - it's just that another experienced engineer and I were comple...
