Thanks Pieterh.   This is indeed a major drawback of not having MSE with CAS enabled in the network. This would be required if one intends to see the map location of alarm despite of having CMX in the network ... View more

Hi Rasika, //Rasika: Prime is only to update maps in CMX, nothing else can be done through prime with respect to CMX//   Had been always of the opinion that we have lot to obtain from CMX-Location as compared to MSE-CAS. However there are many limitations imposed by not have MSE-CAS. For instance, not being able to see the "Map Location" of triggered alarms. This is indeed a major limitation. Having both MSE-CAS along with CMX-location will not make any sense though :)   So we will continue to lose map locations of triggered alarms so long as we have CAS service disabled on MSE?   Reference to duplicate thread opened for same query: https://community.cisco.com/t5/wireless-and-mobility/do-we-require-cas-service-despite-of-having-a-dedicated-cmx/m-p/3837630#M108185 ... View more

Thanks Rasika for the response. Glad to see your message :)   Actually my requirement is to have the WGBs in outdoor environment. Since Mobility Express APs cannot be converted to WGBs (for lacking the option of autonomous image), the only feasible option for the Aps from Cisco is IW3700.   Just to support one host behind the WGB, IW3700 would be a difficult option considering the mounting considerations and cost. ... View more

Able to see it after unchecking "Hide cleared alarms" and then in Alarms and Events selecting the option for "Showing Alarm History".   ... View more

Even after unchecking the option of "Hide cleared Alarms", I am not able to see the cleared alarms. Has anyone else too faced similar issues on prime 3.5   ... View more

This is actually a limitation on product side that we could not add MSE as the network device in Prime. Just wanted to check if the limitation continues in latest codes as well. ... View more

//The Rogue Client Threshold is how many connected clients to that rogue before you classify it as a rogue. 0 means don't look at the client count when classifying it as a rogue//   Hello Hayden,   Thanks for the response. Incidentally the "Rogue Client Threshold" does not appear to signify the rule parameter to conclude the ap as rogue.   In my setup, I could see the even the APs having 0 clients on them are classified as rogue even after setting the "Rogue Client Threshold" to 1. It appears to signify something else from what it appears to. Incidentally could not find its relevance in documentations too. ... View more