Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hello, Is it possible to change the next-hop of some updates received through eBGP? Let's say the customer receives a flood and wants to advertise to the ISP a /32 prefix so the filtering occurs at the network edge. I was thinking something like: PE ...
Hello,Is it possible to change the next-hop of some updates received through eBGP? Let's say the customer receives a flood and wants to advertise to the ISP a /32 prefix so the filtering occurs at the network edge. I was thinking something like:PE co...
Ok, I've found out what the problem was. It seems that configuring the eBGP session as ebgp-multihop works. Here's the output:router bgp YYY no bgp default ipv4-unicast no bgp default route-target filter bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.2.2 ...
Ok, I've found out what the problem was. It seems that configuring the eBGP session as ebgp-multihop works. Here's the output:router bgp YYY no bgp default ipv4-unicast no bgp default route-target filter bgp log-neighbor-changes neighbor 192.168.2.2 ...
Hi,The route to 192.0.3.1 actually is in the routing table. 5300_Readiness#sh ip route 192.0.3.1Routing entry for 192.0.3.1/32 Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0 (connected) Routing Descriptor Blocks: * directly connected, via Null0 Rou...
Hi Martin, and thanks for the reply.I want to make a step further from the blackhole routing described in those docs, so I don't have to manually provision the static route(s) that gets redistributed by iBGP and trigger blackholing, and to also allow...
