1. I have Hub and several Spokes. I completed with Per-Tunnel QoS from Hub to Spokes and Spoke-to-Spoke.2. But I have delay-sensitive VoIP traffic in both directions - Hub-Spoke and Spoke->Hub, but the latter is not covered with any QoS Policy.3. Ph...
Hello! We have CSR1000v in production under KVM from one of our Hosters.All began with Speed Issues with uplinks (Big Jitter, Latencies etc.) After a week of troubleshooting we diagnosed CSR had 100% CPU-usage on three of eight its COREs. Further tro...
Hello!
I've trouble with NAT. CE has two uplinks. Two ISPs, two /30 networks. I'd like to utilize both connections in the following manner:
interface FastEthernet0/0.101
description UL:pe.m34:gi0/1.1206
encapsulation dot1Q 101
ip address 194.8...
Hello!
I try the following diagram:
laptop - R1 - SW1 - SW2 - R2 - laptop
Both SWs have mtu 1600
R1 and R2 have successfully made up OSPF adjacency and they are also LDP neighbors.
R1's config:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.4094 encapsulation dot1...
Hello,
I made working configuration on my home "test-bench" CME for SIP-phones. All is working well. I configured well-styled dial-peers like these:
dial-peer voice 1001 voip description Outgoing Emergency (01/02/03/04) translation-profile outgoing ...
I saw this document. It is rather unuseful (because it does not explain anything! Just simple example). It seems I found solution!1. Spoke sends to Hub GROUP, Hub applies POLICY linked to this group in its configuration of Tunnel interface. Right?2. ...
Sound like something obscure.. Two DMVPNs?? Are you serious? For two kinds of traffic? What if the third will arise? Fourth? And what about PHB QoS? It is not the exit.. I thought about different matching strategies in policies "Spoke-to-Hub" and "...
