Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi, Please can someone confirm if the following routing policy is supported on Catalyst SD-WAN? Scenario:2 DC sites (hub sites) and 2 Spoke Sites. DC1 and DC2 (the hub sites) are interconnected via BGP.We want to confirm if the following policy is su...
Hi, We have a SAN network of 2x Nexus 5548 switches with Fiber Channel. Both Nexus are linked together with San port-channel FC ISL trunk links, and we are using a single VSAN. Topology is as follows: Nexus-5548-A < ----- > Nexus-5548-B Initiators (H...
Hi,
I have a working LAB environment with ISE 3.3 (Patch 10) and Windows 11 Endpoint with Windows Native Supplicant. This is using TEAP (EAP-TLS) for both machine and user authentication using certificates (machine certs + user Certs already deployed...
Hi,
I have ISE 3.3 with patch 10 installed. Im trying to configure an ISE TEAP Policy with the condition "Network Access EapChiningResult" with the conditions as shown on the following figure taken from the link below.
Cisco ISE: Simplified Machi...
Hi,
Any help with the following?
I have Catalyst Center configured with Composite Templates for Day N Deployment. Each regular template inside the composite template have variables configured.
Due to the high number of switches to be deployed, there...
Thanks,Can you confirm if this can also be achieved if instead we use AAR Policy, so for example Site 1 prefer DC1 (if SLA met) and use backup of DC2, and on Site 2 prefer DC2 (if SLA met) and use backup as DC1.
Thanks @Torbjørn so this is technically possible to have 2 different control policies active and applied to 2 different groups of Spoke Sites?I was confused with the wording of this document, so in summary, you can have 2 site lists, and on each site...
Hi @Mark Elsen unfortunately, it partially worked, as I was able to configure the attribute "eap chaining results" with no issues, but then when I tried to add the second "And" condition of "Eap tunnel = Teap", It didnt show it. So I deleted the rule...
Thanks Mark, that was the issue, they way that ISE was configured on the "allowed protocols" matching both EAP Chaining under TEAP and EAP Fast. Solved by disabling on Eap fast, and just kept enabled on TEAP. Now the Eap conditions are visible.
Thank...