Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Ven Diesel
08-18-2017
Stats
Member since
05-21-2012
42
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
06-26-2013
04:24 PM
Robert No my concern is not about setting up switches in stack, I want to make sure we are following standard practise while creating uplinks to core and rest of the layer 2 features.
... View more
06-26-2013
12:53 PM
Hi Reza Thanks a lot for your reply, to get some more insight to design and consider best design practise HA and redundancy are major factors as we are voip based network I want to make sure all factors like Port security, VLANs, Quality of Service (QoS), spanning tree are designed properly 1) connecting 10 gig uplinks from two different switches(master 1 and 2) in core to two different switches in access layer 2960(master 1 and 2)? is this correct 2) is it recommended to seperate spanning tree between two platforms? 3) is 3750x capable of handling all the processing for routing and intervlan for the extra load.
... View more
06-26-2013
12:04 PM
Hi We are increasing the size of our voip based network and planning to purchase 8-2960-xr or 8-3750-x additonal switches, currently we are using 8-3750-x stack switches as core. My question is can I connect the new stack switches to exsisitng 3750-x by configuring layer2 portchannels, so that all the routing and intervlan routing can be done on core 3750x, is this a valid implementation design ? Any recommendation for set this up will be really appreciated. Many Thanks Ven
... View more
- Tags:
- 3750x
Labels:
04-08-2013
06:55 AM
Hi Thanks for validating, I will complete it out of hours and will update you Thanks Again Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App
... View more
04-08-2013
04:12 AM
Hi All We recently had an issue on one of our core switch supervisor which caused reboot phones connected to the switch and we are noticing flapping of mac-address. Redundancy on sw03 is configured as rpr mode, primary failed over to standby clod and secondary was in active mode. In order to avoid this situation in future I am plaaning to configure redundancy as SSO and reload the switch, I want to know after making the changes(I mean reload the switch) will the primary mod becomes active and secondary mod will standby hot as SSO will be configured. attching the current staus on switch for your reference any suugestions much appreciated Many Thanks Ven
... View more
- Tags:
- catalyst_4500
Labels:
01-08-2013
05:02 PM
No Jouni for vpn all we are doing is access-list xxx extended permit ip 10.4.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.33.1.0 255.255.255.0 access list no nat ip 10.4.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.33.1.0 255.255.255.0 Branch network will access vpn to client and voice platform as it is hosted in main site No there are servers in client side, so we and our branch office need to access
... View more
01-08-2013
04:46 PM
Hi Jouni Thanks a lot for you reply Yes the situation is we cant make any changes to L2L VPN, we are left with only option to make change internally and get this work
... View more
01-08-2013
04:24 PM
Hi All I need you valuable suggestions for the below scenario we are having a site 2 site vpn between ourself and client, our range is 10.4.0.0/16 to 10.33.1.0/24(client) vpn is up and running, we are having a different brach site (10.3.0.0/16) and we are connected via MPLS circuit connected to our cisco router and cisco router to core netwrok the normal routing is working perfectly between our self and branch site. Now I need to make 10.3.0.0/16 subnets to access the client subnet 10.33.1.0/24 using exsisiting vpn between ourself and client, is this possible using nat? Many Thanks Ven
... View more
Labels:
01-08-2013
08:11 AM
Hi Guys The above solution working perfectly and thanks again for your assitance
... View more
01-04-2013
07:22 AM
Hi Rofl you made a valid point and thanks a lot so I made modifcation and please give your feedback PBR Testing: My aim with the new additional PBR config is to use different default hop instead of the exsisiting default route and I want rest of the routing for this subnet range to be routed via exsisiting routing table and we are using static routing on 4507 Please let me know if I am going in the right diretion and much apprecaite for all your time and assisitance SAMPLE Final CONFIG: access-list 25 permit ip 10.40.125.0 0.0.0.255 ?(any) route-map test permit 25 match ip address 25 set ip default next-hop 10.40.5.1 SW01 int vlan 125 ip add 10.40.125.0 255.255.255.0 ip address 10.40.125.231 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.40.1.208 standby 125 ip 10.40.125.251 standby 125 priority 140 standby 125 preempt ip policy route-map test exsisiting Default route on sw01 is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.40.3.1 Cheers
... View more
01-03-2013
05:50 PM
That is exactly what I am looking for so is the pbr config acceptable and can be implemented for testing?
... View more
01-03-2013
05:28 PM
Hi Sorry if I confused you We are planning to decomission the checkpoint, so it will take time and I want to make use of PBR untill the complete migration is done Let me know if anymore info required Cheers
... View more
01-03-2013
04:32 PM
Hi All I am planning to implement PBR on our core switch, so basically idea is we are having checkpoint connected to isp1 and asa connected to isp2, I got a default route on core towards checkpoint and all internet access is being provided via isp 1 at the moment however we want to get rid of isp1 and checkpoint and start using isp2 and asa. we are having many int vlans on the switch and I am going to create a test int vlan and config as follows access-list 40 permit ip 10.40.1.0 0.0.0.255 route-map test permit 40 match ip address 40 set ip next-hop 10.40.5.x int vlan 11 ip policy route-map test so after applying this what will happen to all the remaining subnets will they use the routing table default route or acl will deny all the traffic? Please let me know am I doing it right and evetually i want all other vlan ip ranges to be following same path, please help me in sorting this out Thanks Ven
... View more
- Tags:
- routing
Labels:
Created by
Ven Diesel
in Switching
06-26-2013
06-26-2013
Thanks for the recommendation will note that,
Created by
Ven Diesel
in Switching
06-26-2013
06-26-2013
RobertNo my concern is not about setting up switches in stack, I want to
make sure we are following ...
Created by
Ven Diesel
in Switching
06-26-2013
06-26-2013
Hi RezaThanks a lot for your reply, to get some more insight to design
and consider best design prac...
Created by
Ven Diesel
in Switching
06-26-2013
06-26-2013
Hi We are increasing the size of our voip based network and planning to
purchase 8-2960-xr or 8-3750...
04-08-2013
HiThanks for validating, I will complete it out of hours and will update
youThanks AgainSent from Ci...
04-08-2013
Hi AllWe recently had an issue on one of our core switch supervisor
which caused reboot phones conne...
01-08-2013
No Jouni for vpn all we are doing isaccess-list xxx extended permit ip
10.4.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.33.1....
01-08-2013
Hi JouniThanks a lot for you replyYes the situation is we cant make any
changes to L2L VPN, we are l...
01-08-2013
Hi AllI need you valuable suggestions for the below scenariowe are
having a site 2 site vpn between ...
01-04-2013
HiRofl you made a valid point and thanks a lot so I made modifcation and
please give your feedbackPB...
01-03-2013
That is exactly what I am looking for so is the pbr config acceptable
and can be implemented for tes...
01-03-2013
HiSorry if I confused youWe are planning to decomission the checkpoint,
so it will take time and I w...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 05-21-2012 05:55 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 08-18-2017 04:03 AM |
| Total Messages Posted | 42 |
Helpful Votes Given To
.jpg "VIP Expert"){kind=icon}
