Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About Matt Sirotzki
Stats
Member since
07-03-2013
9
Posts
0
Helpful
0
Solutions
11-08-2014
11:27 AM
Well I got it working. Was missing the (conf-if)isdn protocol-emulate network on the interface going to the PBX. It's still slow going though. I'm kind of mucking up my head with the dial-peers. I'm pretty sure I just keep over complicating things. The incoming vs outgoing is kind of throwing me at times. I have the translations all set (incoming calls go to the PBX AA and DID all work) but I still have issues accessing the voice mail system from the IP phones. Any basic idea's to help me not over complicate the dial-peers? Another issue is the PBX programming. These comdial systems appear to use a very basic numbering system and don't appear to have the ability to add outside extensions (although I somehow doubt this) and advise in making the cme "fool" the pbx more? (I think the translations are the key) Thanks all.
... View more
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in IP Telephony and Phones
in IP Telephony and Phones
10-29-2014
09:44 AM
10-29-2014
09:44 AM
Good day all! So this is for 2 things. First my study purposes and secondly to test CME for this company. The test router is a 2821 with an VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 and an NM-HD-2VE . We have an old Comdial PBX that we are currently using. (This is what will be replaced eventually.) I have the 2821 all setup to send calls out the PRI side (our t1 is 12 lines so 1-12) but for the life of me I can't figure out what configuration I would need to use for the PBX. I figured I would just setup the second t1 (1/0/1) with the reset of the lines (13-24) and I should be able to at least reach the other lines. Nothing but busy with the dial pattern 1.. (100 is the extension range for the PBX and 200 is the CME). I know that's an overlapping dial-plan to the 91[2-9]..[2-9]...... but I get the same results with it removed. The CME will be holding extensions 2xx and the pbx will keep 1xx. I basically want the CME to pass all incoming through to the PBX but allow the CME extensions to dial out and reach the PBX extensions. Can anyone point me in a little better direction? I have attached a basic diagram.
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Switching
in Switching
10-01-2013
03:27 AM
10-01-2013
03:27 AM
I am asking this because of numerous failed attempts before. I first dealt with the small business cisco products. Layer 2 switches didn't seem to accomplish this correctly and layer 3 would require a butt load of acl lists. (Average between 10 to 20 rental offices). After retraining for my CCNA cert I have fallen back in love with iOS and all of the possibilities. However the same question stands. What is the best equipment to accomplish this? Vlans appeared the way to go but I don't want inter van communication. These are very small usage, low load offices but they need some security between one another. (You never know who is going to bring in something nasty). Is it even possible to accomplish this with a switch alone? There is a sonic wall on site also but was planning on just connecting the suites to the wan gateway. Any direction would be greatly appreciated.
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
in Small Business Switches
09-05-2013
11:40 AM
09-05-2013
11:40 AM
I will try to whip something up for you shortly. I thought the tagging would work as well but I seem to have hit another brick wall. I will draw something up later but basically it's SG500 gi13-42 Vlan 50 ip 192.168.50.1 gi13 trunk 50U 51T 52T 53T to Sonicwall 192.168.50.254 gi42 trunk 50U 51T 52T 53T to SG300 SG500 gi1-5 access Vlan 51 ip 192.168.51.1 gi6-8 access Vlan 52 ip 192.168.52.1 gi9-11 access Vlan 53 ip 192.168.53.1 gi20 Trunk Vlan 50 ip 192.168.50.3 50U 51T 52T 53T Looking at this I am thinking haveing vlan 50 on two different ip's may cause some confusion. Either way i'm sure I tried without with no luck
... View more
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
in Small Business Switches
09-05-2013
10:21 AM
09-05-2013
10:21 AM
OK so I checked the router and added ip 192.168.51.0 to the routing table. I still have no connection to it or the other switch as a whole. I can ping the sg300 gateway 192.168.50.3 but can't make the jump over to the sg500. (192.168.50.1) I believe that is the key im looking for. Routing table wise I have SG300 0.0.0.0 /0 192.168.50.254 SG500 192.168.51.0 /24 192.168.50.254
... View more
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
in Small Business Switches
09-04-2013
08:24 PM
09-04-2013
08:24 PM
I will take a look at this tomorrow. I'll keep you informed. This has seriously been driving me nuts. I even contacted...tech support and their answer was that there weren't anymore sub interfaces availiable so it can't be done.
... View more
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
in Small Business Switches
09-04-2013
08:03 PM
09-04-2013
08:03 PM
I was thinking along those lines but I still can't get out of my vlan...stuck at the gateway. I should at least be able to get over to the main vlan 50. Right?
... View more
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
in Small Business Switches
09-04-2013
07:36 PM
09-04-2013
07:36 PM
Ok so I am pulling out my hair with this one and now it's time to ask the people with experience. Basically I have a sg500 stack running a router-on-a- stick setup. I have run out of virtual ports on the sonicwall and am now trying to get internet to route between vlans by taking the sonicwall out of the equation. I have had NO luck and can ner get any vlan other than 50 to see the internet. So here it goes. Main SG500 - Vlan 50 contains a direct trunk connection to the sonicwall on gi 13 - Vlan 50 contains a direct trunk connection to sg300 on gi 42 - 14-41 are in vlan 50 as access ports (internet is ok) - Vlan 50 is set for ip address 192.168.50.1 - Sonicwall ip is 192.168.50.254 Remote SG300 -Vlan 51 is access ports 1-5 ip address 192.168.51.1 -Vlan 52 is access ports 6-9 ip address 192.168.52.1 -Vlan 53 is access ports 10-11 ip address 192.168.53.1 -Vlan 50 is trunk port 20 ip address 192.168.50.2 -dhcp is setup on each interface as well I am not even sure this is possible but I need to somehow route the 192.168.51.1 to 192.168.50.254 so it can get online. However no matter what I try in the routing table I constantly get stuck behind the vlan gateway. So if im on 192.168.52.10 and I trace route out to 192.168.50.1 or 192.168.50.2 or 192.168.50.254 it ALWAYS stops at 192.168.52.1. Any idea's? Suggestions? I'm about ready to give it up and just throw them all together. I have spent far to long on this already. Just to give you an idea what this is for, there are 3 rental offices that all three need internet but should not be able to talk to eachother. Private ports would work but these offices have multiple ethernet ports and if they plug in a printer and PC they won't be able to talk. Any idea's would be greatly appreciated
... View more
Labels:
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Switching
in Switching
08-26-2013
09:34 AM
08-26-2013
09:34 AM
Ok so like many here I have acquired a 2620 but need that precious 2nd ethernet port. There is SO much conflicting information though! I am mostly looking at the NM-1FE2W. Don't care about the expansion cards but this is actually available by me. Here it says i'm good to go. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_ciscoview/device_support/table/cvsdt.html#rtr2600 Here it says no go. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps214/products_tech_note09186a00800ae37f.shtml Some people say YAY some say NAY. Which one is it? I've been looking through the previous posts and the best one I found was here https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2035892 Here Jack had success with the NM-1FE-TX. So that's at least one that will work. What is other peoples experiences? Working NM-1FE-TX; Non Working
... View more
Labels:
11-08-2014
Well I got it working. Was missing the (conf-if)isdn protocol-emulate
network on the interface going...
10-29-2014
Good day all! So this is for 2 things. First my study purposes and
secondly to test CME for this com...
10-01-2013
I am asking this because of numerous failed attempts before. I first
dealt with the small business c...
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
09-05-2013
09-05-2013
I will try to whip something up for you shortly. I thought the tagging
would work as well but I seem...
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
09-05-2013
09-05-2013
OK so I checked the router and added ip 192.168.51.0 to the routing
table. I still have no connectio...
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Small Business Switches
09-04-2013
09-04-2013
I will take a look at this tomorrow. I'll keep you informed. This has
seriously been driving me nuts...
09-04-2013
I was thinking along those lines but I still can't get out of my
vlan...stuck at the gateway. I shou...
09-04-2013
Ok so I am pulling out my hair with this one and now it's time to ask
the people with experience. Ba...
Created by
Matt Sirotzki
in Switching
08-26-2013
08-26-2013
Ok so like many here I have acquired a 2620 but need that precious 2nd
ethernet port. There is SO mu...
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 07-03-2013 08:58 PM |
| Date Last Visited | 05-15-2018 03:33 PM |
| Total Messages Posted | 9 |
