I have some debug output from attempting to register the script as per the below, I have highlighted a possible issue, it seems as if eem cannot open the file.   I went into guesthell and gave the file 777 permissions and still the same issue occurred   [guestshell@guestshell scripts]$ chmod 777 eem_test.py [guestshell@guestshell scripts]$ ls -lah eem_test.py -rwxrwxrwx 1 guestshell guestshell 162 Apr 23 09:08 eem_test.py [guestshell@guestshell scripts]$ exit   Also from what ive read eem should detect the .py extension and register it as python, in the logs below it looks like its attempting to register a tcl script only?   POC-RTR-01(config)#event manager policy flash:/scripts/eem_test.py Apr 23 09:13:36.525: cli_history_entry_add: free_hist_list size=0, hist_list size=7 Apr 23 09:13:36.525: fh_fd_cli_event_match: fd_reg->cli_match_type = 1, match_info->match_type = 1 Apr 23 09:13:36.525: fh_fd_cli_event_match: fd_reg->cli_match_type = 1, match_info->match_type = 1 Apr 23 09:13:36.525: check_eem_cli_policy_handler: command_string=configure terminal Apr 23 09:13:36.526: check_eem_cli_policy_handler: num_matches = 0, response_code = 1 POC-RTR-01(config)#event manager policy eem_test.py EEM configuration: failed to retrieve intermediate registration result for policy eem_test.py POC-RTR-01(config)# Apr 23 09:13:40.022: cli_history_entry_add: free_hist_list size=0, hist_list size=7 Apr 23 09:13:40.022: fh_fd_cli_event_match: fd_reg->cli_match_type = 1, match_info->match_type = 1 Apr 23 09:13:40.022: fh_fd_cli_event_match: fd_reg->cli_match_type = 1, match_info->match_type = 1 Apr 23 09:13:40.022: check_eem_cli_policy_handler: command_string=event manager policy eem_test.py Apr 23 09:13:40.022: check_eem_cli_policy_handler: num_matches = 0, response_code = 1 Apr 23 09:13:40.022: EEM Inside fh_set_policy() Apr 23 09:13:40.022: fh_policyname = eem_test.py Apr 23 09:13:40.022: type = 2 Apr 23 09:13:40.022: checksum type = FH_POLICY_CHECKSUM_UNKNOWN Apr 23 09:13:40.023: found user policy absolute path flash:/scripts/eem_test.py Apr 23 09:13:40.023: found type = 1 Apr 23 09:13:40.023: register eem policy flash:/scripts/eem_test.py Apr 23 09:13:40.023: check 1: not duplicate registration Apr 23 09:13:40.023: Checking security level: ECDSA 192 Apr 23 09:13:40.023: TCL secure mode OFF Apr 23 09:13:40.023: No valid digital signature found or Tcl digital signatures are not supported in this image, registering as a user script. Apr 23 09:13:40.024: waiting for mlang proc Apr 23 09:13:40.025: fh_io_ipc_msg: received FH_MSG_API_INIT; jobid=19, processid=677, client=9, job name=EEM MLANG Proc Apr 23 09:13:40.026: Could not open the file : eem_test.py POC-RTR-01(config)# Apr 23 09:13:40.026: fh_server: fh_io_ipc_msg: received msg FH_MSG_API_CLOSE from client 9 pclient 9 Apr 23 09:13:40.026: fh_io_ipc_msg: received FH_MSG_API_CLOSE client=9 Apr 23 09:13:40.026: No valid digital signature found or Tcl digital signatures are not supported in this image, registering as a user script. Apr 23 09:13:40.026: fh_reg_policy_core failed: failed to retrieve intermediate registration result for policy eem_test.py   ... View more

this is odd, I go through the guide follow it exactly and output as per the below: - LAB-01-RTR-01(config)#virtual-service ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. LAB-01-RTR-01(config)#virt LAB-01-RTR-01(config)#virtual-? virtual-profile virtual-template     ... View more

is this documented anywhere? must the switch be the root instead? Which doesn't make much sense, the SVIs are on the router, the VLANs exist on the router, HSRP is on the router. The switch modules themselves are seen as a separate device.  Surely the router should be the root? ... View more

yes the switch is fully configured and working as expected   from the switch STR-LAB-01-SW-01#sh spanning-tree VLAN0001 Spanning tree enabled protocol rstp Root ID Priority 32769 Address 0041.d2b4.7780 Cost 4 Port 24 (GigabitEthernet0/24) Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Bridge ID Priority 32769 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1) Address 046c.9db3.df00 Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec Aging Time 300 sec Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type ------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- -------------------------------- Gi0/24 Root FWD 4 128.24 P2p Peer(STP) Gi0/26 Desg FWD 4 128.26 P2p from the router, the router should be the spanning tree root bridge with priority set to 0 but it doesnt seem to be participating at all, in spite of it accepting spanning tree commands STR-LAB-01-RTR-01#sh spanning-tree No spanning tree instance exists. STR-LAB-01-RTR-01#sh run | i span spanning-tree extend system-id spanning-tree vlan 1,5,10,15,20 priority 0 STR-LAB-01-RTR-01#sh vlan VLAN Name Status Ports ---- -------------------------------- --------- ------------------------------- 1 default active 5 DATA active 10 VOICE active 1002 fddi-default act/unsup 1003 token-ring-default act/unsup 1004 fddinet-default act/unsup 1005 trnet-default act/unsup VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2 ---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ -------- ---- -------- ------ ------ 1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 0 0 5 enet 100005 1500 - - - - - 0 0 10 enet 100010 1500 - - - - - 0 0 1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 0 0 1003 tr 101003 1500 - - - - - 0 0 1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - - ieee - 0 0 1005 trnet 101005 1500 - - - ibm - 0 0 Primary Secondary Type Ports ------- --------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------ STR-LAB-01-RTR-01# ... View more

Hi, thanks for the input, but we were already aware of how to console into the switch.    The issues are with the router not showing any spanning tree info.The switch module has all the spanning tree info, which is great, but the router holds the SVIs and we are unable to view any spanning tree info from the router ... View more