HiI'm labbing a scenario where 2 SP networks are joined using Option B and a remote VPN site is connected to each. I have connectivity between sites across the ASBR's working OK. I now want to add in an Inter-AS TE tunnel between the egress PE's and ...
HiCan you please clarify my understanding of MPLS-TE path-options and how the head-end fails over to less-preferred paths when using inter-area tunnels? Assuming I have a working inter-area tunnel with multiple explicit paths defined:The tunnel head-...
HiI have a L3 VPN customer that has a requirement to multicast 1500 byte packets unfragmented across our MPLS network. I have configured:PIM-SSM in the coreMTU of all MPLS enabled links is 1536IP MTU of all MPLS enabled links is 1500MTU of PE-CE link...
HiI'm looking for advice and real world experience in building out large-scale MPLS networks. There's plenty of material out there for scaling OSPF networks but I can't find anything which is specific to scaling the IGP's of MPLS networks.Background...
Both. I'm studying Inter-AS MPLS for SP lab attempt but also have possible requirement to peer with another SP.I've tried changing the next-hop in an import-map but that didn't work. I'll give PBR a try. It looks like there's no simple, scalable solu...
HI GustavoThe Inter-AS VPN with Option B is working. I have an Inter-AS TE tunnel between the PE's and I can route L2VPN traffic through the TE tunnel. But I want to route the VPN traffic through the TE tunnel as well.I cannot see a way of forcing ...
Thanks for your replies.I've got this working now by changing my explicit-paths to use interface addresses instead of RID's and getting RSVP Hellos working properly. I'm testing in Dynamips and the RSVP Hellos weren't triggering the reroute until I ...
Hi LucThe mdt mtu command didn't fix the issue for us.We fixed it by removing "ip mtu 1500" from the PE-P links. This allowed the MTU of the MTI to be large enough to accomodate the 1500 byte C-packet and GRE header without fragmentation.Thanks for...
