Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Dear all,
we would like to upgrade some 3850 from 16.6 to 16.12 Release.
Since 16.9 is Smart Licensing mandatory, is there a license to be bought for the compliance? If yes, which kind of license (SKU) keeping in mind that those 3850 are in standalon...
Hello,I'm not able to convert a EWC to a simple CAPWAP AP... checking the CCO docs it seems very easy : https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/embedded-wireless-controller-on-catalyst-access-points/215303-embedded-wireless-controller-co...
Dear all, we are running a controller 9800-CL with Release 17.3 configured both for IPv4 and IPv6 on its interfaces and also for naming resolution. The controller was registered with the Smart Account/Licensing but lately as soon we've added APs the ...
Hello, I was wonder if a Stack (SFP+ ports) of 2x Cat1000 support cross-stack Etherchannel or not...on the documentation is only mentioned channel support (PaGP and LACP). Thanks in advance for the supportBROmar
Dear all, as for the 2X00/3X00 model we would like to use Priming procedure on the new out-of-the-box Cat9115AX to prime the AP with:- static IP parameters (Address, Mask and Gateway) ;- AP name;- static primary controller IP (which is a Cat9800); It...
Hi Leo,
thanks for the detailed information provided... I've notice that you're running 16.12.4, do you have swithces with 16.12.8?
Checking the RN I've seen that in 16.12.8 several memory issue are resolved.
Concerning the FN-72323 in last occurance...
Hello to all, thanks for the excellent feedabck...It took me a while to login to the AP because factory credentials are not the one mentioned in the document...I was able to connect to AP with credentials cisco/Cisco and not admin/Cisco123
Hello, thank for the linkI've Release 17.3 and it should not be impacted but is quite similarI will definitively have a look to add a static entry and see what's happen BROmar
Hello Leo, Thanks a lot for the confirmation... that was what I'm looking for Obviously on large scale APs deployment this approach is not scalable... but on few could be OK especially if DHCP/DNS services are not managed by ourselves