Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
For the Cisco 2960s there are two main Images in the 15.0 tree available - the 15.0(2)SE and the 15.0(2)EX.Cisco lists some differences on the comparison-page[¹], but some aren't. For example the ENT-SENSOR-MIB is available for the EX-Images but not ...
I run a stack of WS-2960X-48TD-L width 15.0(2)EX5. This stack was an exchange for an WS-C4506 with Sup V.Since the Stack ist running instead of the 4500, Ports leading to servers running Windows 2008/2012 go down unintentionally. This happens multipl...
As several documents mention, it should be possible to authenticate on a switch via radius with a public key.For example http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/SSH-to-Cisco-Devices-td5714654.htmlI tried several ways, for exampleaaa group server radi...
Does anyone know the exakt difference between this two versions? I can only suggest it's for stacking 2960X and 2960S (and hope it doesn't have the 2960X-Bug )?Release notes only mention the 2960X!?Thanks in advance.
I get this nice error on a switch once every hour.Switch type is WS-C2960S-48-TD-L, Software version 15.0(2)SE4.Any idea what it means or what I can do to fix it (cant't restart it now!)?Google has no results.Jul 26 03:01:00: %ENTROPY-0-ENTROPY_ERROR...
Interesting the Forum killed my codeMy example was:aaa group server radius RadiusServer server-private auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key 7 aaa authentication login default group RadiusServer localaaa authorization exec default group RadiusServer loc...
I'd rather suggest you configured something wrong. I'd guess your tacacs not reachable and you don't have a fallback configured.I have a lot of 2960 / 3560 running with 12.2(55)SE7 and SE8 - no one ever had a problem with tacacs.
There is no routing between the vlans and there does not have to be a routing between to let the hosts ping the other one.A packet going out an access port is not tagged with a vlan as you posted yourself and thats also why you need no routing and wh...
I don't see why it should be working?The VLAN-ID itself means nothing if it's only locally defined.If you take VLAN 2 or VLAN 999 or any other number, both ports are in the same vlan, so incoming traffic on one port can reach any other port on that s...
The provisioning command itself does not have to be used. You may use it if you want to tell the switch that another one will be joining the stack and you want to set up a configuration for it.If you want to stack to switches you don't need to enter ...
